Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Dalian Medical University Zhongshan College requesting a graduate to delete a video showcasing her selling ice cream has sparked widespread attention, highlighting the tension between individual expression and institutional reputation [1][2]. Group 1: Institutional Response - The university's request for the video removal was justified by concerns over negative comments in the video's comment section, which promoted the idea that "education is useless" and disparaged higher education [1]. - The school expressed that it does not discriminate against any profession, yet its actions to privately request video deletion created a contradiction that may deepen public distrust [1][2]. - The timing of the incident coincided with critical periods for college admissions, leading the institution to be particularly sensitive to any potentially damaging information [2]. Group 2: Graduate's Situation - The graduate, referred to as Li, is not in a state of "immediate unemployment" as she previously worked in a hospital for two years before choosing to sell ice cream as a transitional means of income while preparing for further examinations [2]. - Li's expression of feeling that she was "bringing shame" to her alma mater was more a reflection of her emotional state rather than a direct accusation against the school [2]. Group 3: Societal Perceptions - The prevalent "education is useless" narrative reflects societal stereotypes and double standards regarding graduates from different tiers of educational institutions [3]. - If a top medical school graduate chose to sell ice cream, it would likely be viewed as a personal choice or life experience, whereas a graduate from a private college would face criticism regarding their abilities or the quality of their education [3]. - The university could have adopted a more constructive approach by engaging with the audience in the comment section to reshape the narrative, rather than opting for video removal [3].

Group 1 - Zhang Xuefeng's potential departure from live streaming has sparked significant public interest, with emotional expressions indicating the pressures faced in the industry [1] - Many individuals resonate with Zhang's situation, speculating about the challenges he faces, while some express support through humorous remarks [2] - The profession of providing guidance on college majors is seen as a business that capitalizes on societal trends, often prioritizing profit over genuine educational value [2][3] Group 2 - The emphasis on adapting to societal expectations in education may lead to a future where many recommended majors become obsolete, reflecting the consequences of uncritical conformity [3] - The sensationalized language used by live streamers to discuss academic choices diminishes the perceived value of knowledge, reducing it to mere marketable skills [5] - The crude nature of these live streams serves as a reflection of broader societal attitudes towards education and knowledge, where the focus is on immediate utility rather than long-term understanding [6][18] Group 3 - There exists a dichotomy in Chinese culture where there is a strong push for education, yet a simultaneous undervaluation of knowledge itself, often equating learning with job prospects rather than intellectual growth [8][9] - The historical context of education in China reveals a long-standing trend of valuing credentials over genuine knowledge, which continues to influence current educational practices [12][14] - The rise of "experience over knowledge" mentality contributes to the popularity of superficial educational guidance, as families prioritize immediate job readiness over comprehensive learning [17][18]