财务数据披露违规

Search documents
上交所对*ST天择及相关责任人通报批评
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-16 06:24
Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has criticized *ST Tianze and related responsible individuals for inaccurate disclosures regarding the company's annual performance, particularly concerning its revenue and potential delisting risks [1]. Group 1: Company Performance and Compliance - *ST Tianze's annual performance is a significant concern for investors, especially with a negative net profit and the potential for revenue to fall below 300 million yuan, which could trigger delisting risk warnings [1]. - The company failed to accurately disclose whether its revenue would be below 300 million yuan and did not provide adequate risk warnings regarding factors affecting revenue expectations [1]. - The actions of *ST Tianze violated multiple provisions of the Shanghai Stock Exchange's listing rules, leading to disciplinary actions against the company and its executives [1]. Group 2: Financial Data - For the year 2024, *ST Tianze's revenue composition was 97.87% from media and 2.13% from other businesses [2]. - As of the report date, *ST Tianze's market capitalization was 2.9 billion yuan [2].
上交所对*ST艾艾及相关责任人通报批评
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-16 06:24
Group 1 - The Shanghai Stock Exchange criticized *ST Ai Ai for failing to disclose its annual performance forecast within the required timeframe, as the company reported a negative net profit for the fiscal year 2024 and its operating revenue fell below 300 million yuan [1] - The company’s revenue composition for the year 2024 indicates that 99.02% of its revenue came from industrial operations, while other businesses contributed only 0.98% [2] - As of the report date, *ST Ai Ai has a market capitalization of 1.9 billion yuan [2] Group 2 - The disciplinary actions taken against *ST Ai Ai include a public reprimand for the company and its key executives, including the chairman, CFO, and board secretary, due to violations of the Shanghai Stock Exchange's listing rules [1] - Similar cases of public reprimands for financial disclosure inaccuracies have been noted in other companies, indicating a trend of regulatory scrutiny in the industry [3]