财政拨款法案
Search documents
公共服务受到影响,雇员面临无薪休假,美联邦政府“停摆”超一周
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-10-08 22:54
Group 1 - The U.S. federal government has been in a shutdown for over a week due to a stalemate between the two parties on the budget bill, affecting public services and potentially putting over 800,000 federal employees on unpaid leave [1] - The Federal Aviation Administration reported significant delays at major airports due to a shortage of air traffic controllers caused by the shutdown, with warnings that if the shutdown continues into November, millions of Americans' Thanksgiving plans could be disrupted [1] - The White House's Office of Management and Budget is preparing to allocate $12 to $13 billion from internal accounts of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to assist farmers affected by government tariff policies, but the agricultural aid plan has been delayed due to the shutdown [1] Group 2 - The tourism industry is projected to lose $1 billion for each week of the shutdown, with national parks losing $1 million in ticket revenue daily and surrounding businesses losing $77 million each day [2] - The shutdown may negatively impact market sentiment due to threats of layoffs and actual unemployment, potentially exacerbating risks in the labor market and weakening consumer confidence [2] - The White House's stance on unpaid wages for furloughed federal employees has shifted, with a memo stating that these employees have no right to back pay, contradicting decades of precedent [2] Group 3 - Initially, the Trump administration aimed to use the shutdown as an opportunity for large-scale layoffs of federal employees, but internal concerns about political risks have led to a postponement of these plans [3] - Trump expressed a willingness to reach a "correct agreement" with Democrats, indicating a potential signal of compromise from the Republican side, but Democrats responded negatively, insisting on maintaining healthcare subsidies before negotiations [3] - The ongoing dispute between the two parties centers on whether to resolve the funding issue first or to ensure the extension of healthcare subsidies, with no clear path to compromise currently evident [3]