▽以下是正文 有网友谈到，如果做了类似"三天可见"的设置，家属拿回账号就能更好怀念逝者。对此，主流法律意见认为，逝者对朋友圈内容设置可见时间、范围， 属于逝者生前另有安排的内容，受到《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》的保护。不过，可能很多用户在设置时并没有考虑过去世后的情况，这个议题 有待继续讨论。 对外经贸大学数字经济与法律创新研究中心主任许可表示："因为平台账号资源有限、安全策略等，对不活跃账号进行回收，是互联网平台的通行策略。 这一次，出于逝者纪念的需求，微信对不活跃账号不执行回收策略，迈出了重大的一步。"他也强调："关于逝者账号的移交、继承及逝者近亲属对个人 信息查阅、删除等问题，还需要法律、伦理专家、平台、有关部门共同参与，深入讨论，制定有温度、合法合规且有可操作性的合同安排和法律规范。" 来源 /新华社 总编/杨锐 责编/张云龙 值班编辑/孔德云 编排/刘金娇 近日，话题"人去世了微信朋友圈会消失吗"在网上引发关注。记者16日从微信确认，从今年9月开始，微信对长时间不使用的微信账号已不再进行回收处 理，不活跃账号的朋友圈内容同样不会清理。 针对朋友圈为什么没有二次编辑和访客功能，微信公关总监"@微信 ...

Group 1 - WeChat has confirmed that accounts of deceased users will not be reclaimed, and their Moments will not be cleared starting from September this year [1] - The WeChat public relations director stated that there will be no visitor function for Moments to avoid increasing social pressure on users [1] - The possibility of a secondary editing function for Moments is unlikely, as it is viewed as a record of a person's history that should not be easily altered [1] Group 2 - Legal experts highlight the complexities surrounding the inheritance and management of deceased users' accounts, including privacy concerns related to chat records and contacts [2] - There is a discussion on whether settings like "three days visibility" for content can help relatives better remember the deceased, but such settings are protected under personal information laws [2] - The need for further discussion on the transfer and inheritance of deceased users' accounts, as well as the rights of relatives to access or delete personal information, is emphasized [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article discusses the implications of deceased individuals' WeChat accounts and their content, particularly focusing on the permanence of Moments posts and the lack of visitor features [3][4][5] - WeChat has confirmed that as of September this year, inactive accounts will no longer be reclaimed, and the Moments content of these accounts will not be deleted [3] - WeChat's public relations director stated that the absence of visitor features is to avoid adding social pressure to users, and the Moments feature is intended to serve as a historical record of a person's life [3] Group 2 - Legal experts highlight the complexities surrounding the inheritance and management of deceased individuals' accounts, noting potential privacy issues and the lack of economic value associated with personal data [4] - There is a call for further discussion on the legal and ethical frameworks regarding the transfer and access to deceased individuals' accounts, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts among legal, ethical, and platform representatives [5] - The decision by WeChat to not reclaim inactive accounts is seen as a significant step towards honoring the memory of the deceased [5]

Core Points - The topic of whether a deceased person's WeChat Moments will disappear has gained attention online, with WeChat confirming that inactive accounts will no longer be reclaimed since September, and their Moments content will not be cleared [1] - WeChat's public relations director stated that there will be no visitor function for Moments to avoid increasing social pressure, and a second editing feature is unlikely as Moments serve as a historical record of a person's life [1] - Legal experts highlight the complexities surrounding the inheritance and management of deceased individuals' accounts, noting potential privacy issues and the lack of economic value in personal data [2] - The need for a collaborative discussion among legal, ethical experts, and platforms regarding the transfer and management of deceased accounts is emphasized, suggesting the development of practical legal norms [3] Group 1 - WeChat will not reclaim inactive accounts or clear their Moments content since September [1] - The absence of visitor and second editing features in WeChat Moments is to reduce social pressure and maintain the integrity of personal history [1] - Legal discussions are necessary regarding the inheritance and management of deceased individuals' accounts, focusing on privacy and data ownership issues [2][3] Group 2 - The decision to not reclaim inactive accounts is a significant step towards honoring the memory of deceased users [3] - There is a need for legal frameworks to address the complexities of accessing and managing the digital assets of deceased individuals [2][3]