Core Viewpoint - The release of the "Asset Management Trust Management Measures" draft aims to regulate the asset management trust business of trust companies, marking a significant development in the asset management industry and reflecting the central financial work meeting's spirit [1] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The draft establishes clear operational standards and regulatory requirements for trust companies, positively impacting the development of asset management trust business [2] - It emphasizes a non-retail high-end private placement positioning for qualified investors, with stricter qualification requirements for different risk levels of trust products [2] - The draft aligns with the three-category classification of trusts, highlighting the service-oriented nature of asset management trusts and introducing additional service norms [2] Group 2: Industry Transformation - The draft drives trust companies to transition from "financing platforms" to "true asset management institutions," focusing on professional investment management capabilities [3] - It promotes the "net value and standardization" of product forms, encouraging a shift from non-standardized debt assets to standardized assets like stocks and bonds [3] - The draft delineates clear boundaries for business innovation, urging trust companies to innovate within a framework of strict risk management and information disclosure [3] Group 3: Unique Characteristics - The draft integrates the unique characteristics of trusts with universal applicability, aligning asset management trust operations with securities fund management standards [4] - It establishes a clear connection between asset management trusts and service trusts, recognizing both as "institutional investors" [5] - The draft imposes strict regulations on non-standard assets, guiding trust companies towards high-quality alternative investment products [5] Group 4: Implementation Challenges - The draft represents a significant opportunity for the trust industry but faces challenges in practical implementation, such as the difficulty in accurately assessing investor risk tolerance [6] - Valuation of non-standard assets poses challenges due to a lack of active trading markets and subjective valuation models [6] - Balancing information disclosure is complex, as overly detailed disclosures may breach commercial confidentiality while insufficient disclosures fail to meet regulatory requirements [6]