Group 1 - The core issue of AI copyright governance is the balance of interests among stakeholders in the content industry, expectations for the development and application of new technologies, and the international competitive landscape [2] - The European Union's approach includes two main legislative acts and one guideline under development, focusing on copyright provisions related to AI [4][5] - The EU's "AI Act" establishes a compliance obligation system for generative AI companies, emphasizing transparency in model training and respecting copyright holders' rights [5][8] Group 2 - The United States is responding to AI copyright challenges through a combination of administrative, judicial, and legislative measures, with ongoing discussions in Congress [13][15] - The U.S. Copyright Office has faced challenges regarding the copyrightability of content created using AI tools, leading to several administrative decisions rejecting such claims [13][14] - The U.S. Congress has held multiple hearings to assess the impact of AI on existing copyright laws and the necessity for legislative updates [15][21] Group 3 - Japan's approach to AI copyright governance relies on existing copyright law, supplemented by administrative guidance to clarify the application of these laws to AI technologies [22][24] - The Japanese government has issued several guidelines to address concerns about AI's impact on copyright, focusing on the responsibilities of AI developers and users [25][27] - Japan emphasizes the importance of defining expectations for behavior among stakeholders in the content industry to promote the application of AI technologies [26] Group 4 - The governance of AI copyright issues in various jurisdictions reflects a trend towards recognizing the need for clear rules regarding model training and content generation [29][33] - There is a growing consensus on the need to differentiate between AI-generated content and content created with human assistance, impacting copyright protection [33][39] - The allocation of responsibility for copyright infringement in AI-generated content remains a complex issue, with different jurisdictions adopting varying approaches [40][42] Group 5 - China's recent legislation on generative AI services marks a significant step in addressing copyright issues related to AI technologies [45][46] - Chinese courts have begun to establish precedents regarding the copyrightability of AI-generated content, indicating a developing legal framework [46][47] - The ongoing discussions in China reflect a cautious approach to balancing innovation in AI with the protection of copyright holders' rights [49][50]