李在明是在二十国集团领导人峰会结束后从南非飞往土耳其途中作上述表态的。他说当前南北关系变得 极度敌对、对立，缺乏基本信任。 据新华社报道，11月24日，韩国总统李在明表示必须耐心持续推动重启韩朝对话。 李在明说目前所有沟通渠道都被切断，即使发生偶发性冲突也无法解决，令人担忧。李在明说韩方没 有"吸收统一"的想法，应先与朝方对话，实现和平共处，再谈统一。 ...

Group 1 - The core message of the article emphasizes the need for economic recovery and normalization in South Korea, as stated by President Lee Jae-myung during his first 100 days in office [1] - President Lee highlighted the urgency of restoring the domestic economy, which has been adversely affected by prolonged weak demand [1] - The government aims to continue efforts to restart dialogue with North Korea, despite the lack of progress in inter-Korean relations [1] Group 2 - The recent incident involving the U.S. capturing over 300 South Korean citizens is expected to make South Korean companies hesitant about investing in the U.S. [1] - Concerns have been raised regarding the potential negative impact on South Korean firms considering establishing operations in the U.S. [1] - The South Korean government is in discussions with the U.S. to ensure normal processing of visas related to investments in the U.S. [1] Group 3 - President Lee emphasized that there will be no behind-the-scenes negotiations regarding U.S.-South Korea tariff talks, and decisions will not be made that could harm national interests [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the meeting between South Korean National Assembly Speaker Yoo Won-sik and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during a commemorative event in Beijing, raising questions about the potential impact on inter-Korean relations [1] Group 2 - The meeting took place at a significant event marking the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War [1] - There is uncertainty regarding whether Yoo and Kim engaged in discussions and the topics they may have covered, which adds to the intrigue surrounding their encounter [1]

Group 1 - Tensions between North and South Korea have escalated following gunfire near the military demarcation line, with both sides accusing each other of provocation [1][2] - The South Korean military reported that North Korean soldiers crossed the military demarcation line, prompting warning shots from the South [1] - North Korea's military leadership condemned South Korea's actions as serious provocation, claiming they were conducting border fortification work [1][2] Group 2 - The South Korean government has shifted its stance towards North Korea, having passed a resolution to suspend the 2018 military agreement aimed at reducing tensions [3] - Recent statements from South Korean President Lee Jae-myung indicate a desire to ease tensions and restore relations with North Korea, while still pursuing denuclearization [3][4] - Despite the softer rhetoric, joint military exercises between South Korea and the U.S. continue, emphasizing readiness against perceived threats from North Korea [4] Group 3 - North Korea has responded critically to South Korea's policies, accusing it of misleading the public regarding the state of inter-Korean relations [5][6] - North Korean officials have dismissed South Korea's attempts at reconciliation as insincere, asserting that military exercises conducted by South Korea and the U.S. pose a direct threat to their security [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that North Korea dismisses South Korea's attempts to improve relations as unrealistic and believes that the current South Korean government is no different from its predecessor in its approach to North Korea [1][2]. - North Korea's stance is that no matter what policies or suggestions South Korea proposes, it remains uninterested in engaging in discussions with South Korea [2][3]. - South Korean President Lee Jae-myung emphasizes the importance of restoring dialogue with North Korea and acknowledges the significant regression in inter-Korean relations over the past three years [3][4]. Group 2 - President Lee Jae-myung highlights the historical significance of the first inter-Korean summit and the joint declaration, which marked a turning point in the relationship between the two Koreas [4]. - Lee asserts that peace is essential for economic stability and that the South Korean government will work to transform the risks associated with the Korean Peninsula into opportunities for mutual prosperity [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that North Korea remains uninterested in improving relations with South Korea, regardless of the latter's efforts or policy changes [1]. Group 1: North Korea's Stance - North Korea's leadership, represented by Kim Yo-jong, criticizes the South Korean government's attempts to improve relations as unrealistic and naive [1]. - The article highlights that past actions by South Korea, such as declaring North Korea as a primary enemy, have created a hostile environment that cannot be easily changed [1]. - North Korea perceives the current South Korean administration as continuing the same confrontational approach as its predecessor, particularly in its alignment with the U.S. [1]. Group 2: South Korea's Efforts - The article mentions South Korea's speculation about inviting North Korea to the upcoming APEC leaders' informal meeting, which North Korea dismisses as unrealistic [1]. - Despite South Korea's attempts to engage, North Korea asserts that it has no interest in any discussions or negotiations with the South [1].

Core Viewpoint - North Korea dismisses South Korea's efforts to improve relations as unrealistic, emphasizing that past actions have created a hostile environment that cannot be changed by mere words [1] Group 1: North Korea's Stance - North Korea's Deputy Minister Kim Yo-jong states that South Korea's recent attempts to invite North Korea to the APEC meeting are seen as a "pipe dream" [1] - The North criticizes the South for its unilateral declaration of North Korea as a primary enemy and for fostering an atmosphere of extreme confrontation [1] - North Korea believes that the current South Korean government is blindly following the U.S.-South Korea alliance and has no intention of changing its adversarial view towards South Korea [1] Group 2: South Korea's Efforts - The South Korean government, under Lee Jae-myung, has made efforts to improve relations with North Korea, but these are viewed as one-sided and ineffective by the North [1] - North Korea asserts that regardless of South Korea's policies or proposals, it has no interest in engaging in discussions with the South [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the geographical and economic significance of border cities in China, particularly focusing on Dandong, Heihe, and Fangchenggang, and highlights the potential for trade and political changes in the region. Group 1: Geographical Insights - Dandong, Heihe, and Fangchenggang are the only three prefecture-level cities in China that directly border foreign countries [1][2] - Dandong is the largest among these cities, with a population of approximately 2 million and a GDP of about 100 billion [12] - The proximity of Dandong to North Korea and its potential for trade is emphasized, especially if geopolitical conditions change [14] Group 2: Economic Data - Dandong's total import and export trade volume is reported at 17.09 billion yuan, while Heihe's is 31.35 billion yuan, and Fangchenggang's is significantly higher at 128.21 billion yuan [13] - The article notes that Dandong's economic potential could increase dramatically with improved relations on the Korean Peninsula [14] Group 3: Political Context - The article mentions recent changes in North Korea's approach to tourism, with North Korean citizens visiting Dandong, which may signal a shift in political openness [26][30] - The new South Korean administration under Lee Jae-myung is focusing on peace and economic cooperation, which could impact border dynamics [32][34] - The deterioration of North Korea-South Korea relations and the strengthening of North Korea-Russia ties are highlighted as significant geopolitical developments [40][41]