Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding a game streamer highlights the intersection of personal opinions and brand responsibilities in the gaming industry, leading to significant backlash against brands associated with the streamer [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Impact - The gaming industry has seen rapid growth, with projected revenues reaching 325.7 billion yuan in 2024, making it a significant cultural export [2]. - The incident has caused a ripple effect, impacting not only the streamer but also the brands associated with them, leading to calls for accountability that extend beyond contractual obligations [1][2]. - The emotional response from the gaming community has transformed a discussion about game design into a broader societal debate, complicating the industry's operational environment [2][3]. Group 2: Public Discourse - The controversy reflects a trend of emotional manipulation and group polarization in online discussions, where specific incidents are used to create broader societal divides [3]. - The gaming community is urged to maintain a rational discourse, focusing on facts rather than succumbing to emotional outbursts and collective blame [3]. - A call for a healthier online environment emphasizes the need for constructive criticism and the importance of preserving public rationality in discussions related to the gaming industry [3].