Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the necessity of green agriculture as a sustainable development path guided by Marxist views on nature, promoting ecological and agricultural synergy [1] - The article highlights the importance of farmers' value recognition and willingness to participate in green agriculture, suggesting the use of various media to enhance their understanding of the relationship between ecological protection and high-quality agricultural development [1][2] - It advocates for the protection of arable land and pollution remediation as foundational actions for high-quality agricultural development, emphasizing resource supply principles and the need to reduce idle or abandoned farmland [2] Group 2 - The article discusses the optimization of agricultural industrial structure to enhance the value of green agriculture, suggesting the establishment of agricultural product processing chains and the integration of green agriculture with other industries such as tourism and education [2] - It stresses the importance of cultivating talent in green agriculture by attracting skilled individuals from universities and research institutions, as well as providing training for local farmers to understand the long-term value of green agricultural practices [3]

Group 1 - The Marxist view of nature transcends both old materialism's mechanical perspective and idealism's error of viewing nature as a spiritual externalization [1] - Marx emphasizes understanding reality and sensory experiences through human practice rather than merely as objective forms [1][2] - The dialectical relationship between human activity and nature reveals the laws of the dialectical movement between humanized nature and nature in itself [1] Group 2 - Labor serves as the medium that adjusts and controls the material transformation between humans and nature, establishing a dialectical relationship [2] - Through labor, humans transform nature from a mere existence into something that serves their needs, while also internalizing natural laws into human cognition [2] - This process ensures human subjectivity while defining the objective boundaries of human agency [2] Group 3 - Modern industrial production incorporates nature into a value-adding system, leading to a dual process of "socialization of nature" and "naturalization of society" [3] - Capitalist production reshapes the operational logic of natural systems, making natural elements part of the capital cycle [3] - The advancement of science and technology can both break natural limits and pose potential threats of alienation [3] Group 4 - Ecological crises compel a reevaluation of the rationality of human practices, as nature has self-repairing capabilities within certain limits [4] - Exceeding ecological limits results in natural repercussions, such as climate anomalies and resource depletion, which enforce system balance [4] - This necessitates a shift from conquering nature to adhering to its principles [4] Group 5 - The Marxist view ultimately aims to resolve contradictions between humans and nature, as well as among humans, through a higher-level unity of purpose and lawfulness [4] - Ecological limits negate blind practices while providing new possibilities for creative practices [4] - Understanding contemporary ecological crises requires placing environmental issues within the critique of capitalist production methods [4] Group 6 - Xi Jinping highlights that ecological civilization is a product of industrial civilization's development, representing a new requirement for harmonious human-nature relationships [5] - The evolution from primitive civilization's "nature worship" to ecological civilization's "natural symbiosis" illustrates a developmental trajectory [5] - Current ecological civilization construction faces significant challenges, necessitating adherence to ecological priorities and innovative approaches for harmonious coexistence [5]