Core Viewpoint - The report from the Education Bureau of Maoming City highlights the imbalance in educational resource allocation at a local high school, which has focused excessively on cultivating students for prestigious universities like Tsinghua and Peking University, leading to a decline in overall educational quality [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with Current Educational Practices - The practice of concentrating educational resources on top students contradicts the national push for reforming the evaluation system that moves away from solely focusing on university admissions [2]. - By betting on a few top students, the overall quality of education suffers, as most students express dissatisfaction with the school's management and teaching quality [2]. - Setting the admission rates to prestigious universities as a standard for high school revitalization creates a paradox, as an increase in one school's admissions will lead to a decrease in others due to fixed provincial quotas [2]. Group 2: Changing Student Preferences - There is a growing trend among high-achieving students to choose universities other than Tsinghua and Peking University, indicating a shift towards more diverse educational choices and a move away from the "name school" mentality [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for High School Revitalization - High school revitalization should focus on diverse development and personalized education, allowing each student to plan their academic and personal growth paths [3]. - Local governments and educational departments should avoid imposing admission rate targets and instead promote internal development, focusing on teacher quality and curriculum improvement [3]. - The emphasis should be on process evaluation, value-added evaluation, and comprehensive evaluation to assess high school revitalization effectively [3].