Workflow
教育评价改革
icon
Search documents
《广州蓝皮书:广州社会发展报告(2025)》指出——广州持续完善协同育人机制,激发教育创新发展活力
Zhong Guo Fa Zhan Wang· 2025-08-20 05:41
Core Viewpoint - The report highlights Guangzhou's commitment to enhancing collaborative education mechanisms and improving mental health services for students through legislative and reformative measures [1] Group 1: Education Reform Initiatives - Guangzhou will implement the "Action Plan for Improving the Collaborative Education Mechanism (2024-2026)" to standardize home-school collaboration [1] - The city has introduced the first local regulation in China for middle and primary school students' mental health, establishing a comprehensive psychological care system involving government, families, schools, communities, and hospitals [1] - Guangzhou has been recognized for its educational evaluation reforms, leading the province with eight selected cases in the fourth batch of educational evaluation reform [1] Group 2: Mental Health and Well-being - The new mental health regulation aims to integrate psychological education, family education, community education, and healthcare services to enhance the mental health support system for youth [1] - The city has achieved 100% completion of the national "double reduction" pilot city work indicators, ranking first among cities in Guangdong province [1] - Guangzhou has been selected as a demonstration zone for high-quality development in primary and secondary school mathematics education, with 38 educational reform achievements recognized as excellent in Guangdong province [1]
振兴高中不是追求出更多清北生
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-26 22:27
Core Viewpoint - The report from the Education Bureau of Maoming City highlights the imbalance in educational resource allocation at a local high school, which has focused excessively on cultivating students for prestigious universities like Tsinghua and Peking University, leading to a decline in overall educational quality [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with Current Educational Practices - The practice of concentrating educational resources on top students contradicts the national push for reforming the evaluation system that moves away from solely focusing on university admissions [2]. - By betting on a few top students, the overall quality of education suffers, as most students express dissatisfaction with the school's management and teaching quality [2]. - Setting the admission rates to prestigious universities as a standard for high school revitalization creates a paradox, as an increase in one school's admissions will lead to a decrease in others due to fixed provincial quotas [2]. Group 2: Changing Student Preferences - There is a growing trend among high-achieving students to choose universities other than Tsinghua and Peking University, indicating a shift towards more diverse educational choices and a move away from the "name school" mentality [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for High School Revitalization - High school revitalization should focus on diverse development and personalized education, allowing each student to plan their academic and personal growth paths [3]. - Local governments and educational departments should avoid imposing admission rate targets and instead promote internal development, focusing on teacher quality and curriculum improvement [3]. - The emphasis should be on process evaluation, value-added evaluation, and comprehensive evaluation to assess high school revitalization effectively [3].
炒作高分考生为何“树欲静而风不止”
Ke Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-26 23:37
炒作高分考生"树欲静而风不止",归根结底,还在于单一的教育评价体系尚未得到根本扭转。当"行行 出状元"真正成为共识,当评价制度为艺术、体育、创新思维、实践能力等特质真正留出空间,围绕高 分考生的炒作才可能降温。 其实,推行十余年的高考改革,核心目标正是分类考试、综合评价、多元录取,打破"唯分数论"。如 今,在高考分数之外,各地建立了省级统一的综合素质评价信息管理系统,评价结果已成为"强基计 划"等招生方式的重要参考。 要继续深化教育评价改革,引导社会树立正确的教育观和成才观。教育部门要真正将升学率与学校工程 项目、经费分配、评优评先等脱钩,学校要将育人重心转向立德树人,促进学生全面发展。毕竟,教育 的意义不在于缔造传奇,不在于培养少数"高分者",而在于让每个普通人都有人生出彩的机会。 我们要为高分考生鼓掌,也要为所有奋力拼搏的学子鼓掌。愿你们在一个终身学习的社会里,继续前 进,探索不同的可能性,书写属于自己的故事。 每到高考成绩放榜日,"高分考生"便成为关注焦点。尽管教育部连年重申,不得以任何形式宣传炒 作"高考状元""升学率""录取率""高分考生",多地也用"分数屏蔽"的方法试图阻断对状元的"围追堵 截", ...