Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution and current state of high refresh rate displays in gaming devices, highlighting the disparity between technological advancements and actual user experience and application support [1][5][25]. Group 1: High Refresh Rate Technology - High-end gaming devices are expected to have powerful CPUs, GPUs, large memory, and fast storage as core components [1]. - The introduction of high refresh rate displays, such as 750Hz for desktop PCs and 480Hz for laptops, is seen as a significant technological advancement [7][9]. - The smartphone market is also witnessing advancements, with brands like Redmi and OPPO considering 165Hz displays for their devices [11]. Group 2: User Experience and Market Demand - The initial benefits of high refresh rates were widely recognized, leading to a consensus in the consumer electronics industry [5]. - However, the current demand for refresh rates above 120Hz appears to be lukewarm among users, as many high-end laptops with 480Hz displays do not achieve the necessary frame rates in most games [15]. - The high pricing of top-tier GPUs raises concerns about the sustainability of a market focused solely on ultra-high refresh rates [15]. Group 3: Software and Ecosystem Support - The effectiveness of high refresh rate displays relies not only on the hardware but also on software adaptation, which is currently lacking for many applications [13][19]. - Historical examples show that previous high refresh rate initiatives in smartphones did not lead to widespread software support, limiting their practical use [19][21]. - The potential for 165Hz displays in smartphones is contingent on the development of compatible software, which remains uncertain [17][23]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The future application of ultra-high refresh rate displays may be confined to a narrow range of esports titles, limiting their impact on the broader industry [25]. - Without significant advancements in software adaptation and a clear value proposition beyond gaming, the appeal of these high refresh rate technologies may diminish [25].

作为数码发烧友，小雷使用过不少搭载120Hz、144Hz，甚至240、360Hz刷新率的设备，然而因为多方面的限制，这些设备并没有给小雷眼前一亮的感觉。 因此小雷有些好奇，所谓的165Hz 刷新率屏幕，真的能带来质的飞跃吗？ 165Hz刷新率，是噱头还是趋势？ 目前市面上主流手机的刷新率为120Hz，少数主打性能的中端手机会搭载144Hz刷新率的屏幕，从理论角度来说，144Hz刷新率的屏幕肯定是比120Hz要好 的，那为什么屏幕厂商们不主推144Hz屏幕呢？ 手机屏幕的刷新率，已经开始往电竞显示器看齐了？ 知名爆料数码博主@数码闲聊站表示，REDMI已经开始调研新机是否要搭载一块拥有165Hz超高刷新率的屏幕，无独有偶，隔壁一加也正在推进「165Hz手 机+165Hz平板」的产品组合，莫非手机也要进入超高刷新率时代了？ （图片来源：@数码闲聊站） 原因很简单，144Hz的实用性并不强，甚至可以说除了提升宣传时的噱头外，没有太大的实际提升。举个例子，手机屏幕刷新率从60Hz提升到120Hz时，画 面帧率翻了整整一倍，而从120Hz到144Hz，也就提升了20%，这点提升几乎可以忽略不计。 如果将帧率提升到165 ...