Workflow
高压谈判术
icon
Search documents
为制裁俄罗斯,特朗普考虑对中国印度加税500%?美国自己也受不了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-15 04:17
Core Viewpoint - The proposed "Graham Bill" aims to impose a 500% punitive tariff on goods from countries like China and India that continue to import energy from Russia without aiding Ukraine, which could significantly impact global economic markets and energy dynamics [1][3][11]. Group 1: Legislative Proposal and Support - Senator Lindsey Graham introduced the "Graham Bill" on July 7, 2025, which has reportedly garnered support from 82 to 84 senators, indicating a strong legislative foundation [1][3]. - The bill targets countries that import Russian energy while not providing assistance to Ukraine, specifically naming China and India as primary targets [1][3]. Group 2: Economic Implications - China and India are major buyers of Russian oil, with China importing an average of 1.96 million barrels per day (17% of its total imports) and India reaching a historical high of 2.1 million barrels per day (nearly 40% of its total imports) [3]. - If the bill is enacted, it could severely disrupt the global energy market, potentially pushing oil prices above $100 per barrel and triggering inflation crises worldwide [11][19]. Group 3: Diplomatic Reactions - India has expressed its reliance on Russian energy and hopes for U.S. understanding, while China has firmly rejected any external interference in its energy cooperation with Russia [5][7]. - The U.S. government's internal divisions regarding the bill's support suggest a cautious approach, with the White House opting to observe market reactions before committing [17]. Group 4: Strategic Considerations - The bill is viewed as a "double-edged sword," as its implementation could lead to significant repercussions not only for Russia but also for the U.S. economy and its allies [11][19]. - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with both China and Russia accelerating their "de-dollarization" efforts, increasing the use of their currencies in energy transactions, which could undermine the U.S. dollar's dominance [9][19].