Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in recruitment policies at various Chinese universities, moving away from the "non-promotion, non-retention" system for high-level talent, which has caused anxiety among faculty members [3][4]. Group 1: Recruitment Policies - Several universities, including China Ocean University and Hangzhou Electronic Science and Technology University, have announced recruitment policies that do not implement the "non-promotion, non-retention" system, ensuring job security for high-level talent [3][4]. - Institutions like Shenyang University of Technology and Guangxi University of Science and Technology also emphasize that their recruitment does not require adherence to the "non-promotion, non-retention" policy [3][4]. Group 2: Issues with Current Evaluation Systems - The "non-promotion, non-retention" system was intended to enhance competition among faculty but has led to high elimination rates and an overemphasis on publications and projects, often at the expense of teaching quality [4][5]. - Concerns have been raised about the single-dimensional evaluation criteria that prioritize short-term research outputs over long-term academic development [4][5]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Suggestions include reforming the talent evaluation system to create a more diversified and categorized assessment approach, focusing on various aspects such as teaching, research, and social service [4][5]. - The establishment of a comprehensive academic evaluation system that combines quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments is recommended to encourage innovation and support long-term research endeavors [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing emphasis on not implementing the "non-promotion, non-retention" policy by several universities is aimed at alleviating the anxiety of faculty members and attracting high-level talent [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Changes in Universities - Several universities, including China Ocean University and Hangzhou Electronic Science and Technology University, have explicitly stated that they do not implement the "non-promotion, non-retention" policy in their recruitment of high-level talents [1][2]. - The recruitment announcements from institutions like Shenyang University of Technology and Guangxi University of Science and Technology also highlight the absence of the "non-promotion, non-retention" requirement, indicating a shift towards more supportive hiring practices [1][2]. Group 2: Issues with the "Non-Promotion, Non-Retention" Policy - The "non-promotion, non-retention" policy, which requires young faculty to meet certain performance metrics within a specified timeframe, has been criticized for creating significant pressure on researchers [2][3]. - Concerns have been raised regarding the high elimination rates and the overly simplistic evaluation criteria that prioritize publications and projects, potentially neglecting teaching quality and long-term academic development [2][3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Suggestions have been made to reform the talent evaluation system in universities to establish a more diversified and categorized assessment framework, taking into account the specific characteristics of disciplines and positions [2][3]. - The establishment of a multi-faceted evaluation system that includes teaching quality and research contributions is being encouraged to better support young faculty members [3].