Group 1 - Tsinghua University has reported multiple violations related to unauthorized entry and illegal passenger transport on campus, emphasizing a zero-tolerance policy towards such activities [1] - The university has highlighted four specific cases of misconduct involving faculty and students, resulting in administrative penalties and loss of privileges [1] - The institution reiterated that all individuals entering the campus must have legitimate identities and reasonable reporting, with strict prohibitions against paid entry services [1] Group 2 - The article discusses the increasing difficulty for the public to access university campuses, particularly post-pandemic, with many institutions imposing restrictions on entry [2][3] - The concept of "walls" around campuses is explored, indicating that these barriers serve not only as physical defenses but also as psychological separations, defining identities and relationships within and outside the campus [2][7] - The relationship between universities and urban communities is examined, questioning how educational institutions can better integrate with their surrounding environments and serve broader societal functions [4][29] Group 3 - The article raises concerns about the efficiency of resource allocation when public university facilities are restricted to a limited user base, suggesting that this may lead to inefficiencies [3] - It highlights the need for a balanced approach to campus management that considers both security and community engagement, rather than opting for extreme measures of either complete openness or total closure [24][27] - Examples of successful campus openness initiatives, such as those at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, are presented, showcasing how universities can share resources with local communities while maintaining safety [25][26]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining open campuses in universities while balancing safety concerns, arguing against the extreme pursuit of absolute safety that can hinder growth and learning opportunities for students [4][5][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident at Shanghai Jiao Tong University involved a conflict between a parent and a student, raising concerns about campus safety and the implications of open campuses [2][3]. - Opponents of campus openness argue that such incidents highlight potential safety risks and disrupt the educational environment, suggesting a need for more controlled access [3]. Group 2: Arguments for Campus Openness - The article argues that despite safety concerns, universities should remain open, as the current level of openness has not yet returned to pre-pandemic standards [4][5]. - It highlights that the focus should not be on whether to open campuses, but rather on how to do so effectively while fostering a consensus on acceptable risk levels [4][5]. Group 3: Safety vs. Growth - The pursuit of absolute safety can lead to a detrimental "safetyism" mindset, which may deprive young adults of essential experiences needed for resilience and personal growth [5][6]. - The article references the book "The Coddling of the American Mind," which critiques the overemphasis on safety, suggesting that excessive protection can lead to increased fragility among youth [5][6]. Group 4: Societal Impact - The pandemic has heightened societal sensitivity to risks, affecting not only university policies but also educational practices in primary and secondary schools, where safety measures have restricted children's freedom [6]. - The article calls for a shift away from "safetyism" to allow for a more balanced approach to risk, enabling both university students and younger children to grow within a framework of reasonable safety [7].