2025年9月29日，清华大学通过"平安清华"发布通报，披露了近期发生的多起违规报备、违规载客入校的情况。部分 校内人员参与"黑导""黄牛"活动牟利，通过虚假报备、车辆搭载等方式牟利，扰乱了校园秩序。 人们对此类议题的关切并非难以理解。尤其对于21世纪的中国高校来说，校园形态的构筑和演变与国家政治、城市经 济、社会结构的关系更趋紧密。与人们想象的"象牙塔"等田园牧歌般的宁静画面不同，今天的高等教育与高新技术产 业、文化产业、房地产业、商贸服务产业紧紧联系，甚至已经成为城市生产力的重要组成部分。 相比私人住宅小区对外开放道路和设施的争议，对今天的许多公立校园来说，其"开放"似乎是应有之义。"城中之 城"占据了大片土地和公共设施。在运行经费中，一部分是学费，但更大比例来自财政拨款。当这些公共资源只面向 有限用户时，不可避免会出现资源分配效率低下的问题。但在相关讨论中，如何维护高校自有的秩序与安全是不可忽 视的问题。 我们在讨论"高校放开"时，也不应止于校园管理的部分，更应该讨论的是，作为城市社区的一部分，高校空间承载着 怎样的定位和功能？作为生产"知识和人才"的场所，这些知识和人才与社会的联结又应该是怎样的？ 一 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining open campuses in universities while balancing safety concerns, arguing against the extreme pursuit of absolute safety that can hinder growth and learning opportunities for students [4][5][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident at Shanghai Jiao Tong University involved a conflict between a parent and a student, raising concerns about campus safety and the implications of open campuses [2][3]. - Opponents of campus openness argue that such incidents highlight potential safety risks and disrupt the educational environment, suggesting a need for more controlled access [3]. Group 2: Arguments for Campus Openness - The article argues that despite safety concerns, universities should remain open, as the current level of openness has not yet returned to pre-pandemic standards [4][5]. - It highlights that the focus should not be on whether to open campuses, but rather on how to do so effectively while fostering a consensus on acceptable risk levels [4][5]. Group 3: Safety vs. Growth - The pursuit of absolute safety can lead to a detrimental "safetyism" mindset, which may deprive young adults of essential experiences needed for resilience and personal growth [5][6]. - The article references the book "The Coddling of the American Mind," which critiques the overemphasis on safety, suggesting that excessive protection can lead to increased fragility among youth [5][6]. Group 4: Societal Impact - The pandemic has heightened societal sensitivity to risks, affecting not only university policies but also educational practices in primary and secondary schools, where safety measures have restricted children's freedom [6]. - The article calls for a shift away from "safetyism" to allow for a more balanced approach to risk, enabling both university students and younger children to grow within a framework of reasonable safety [7].