Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining open campuses in universities while balancing safety concerns, arguing against the extreme pursuit of absolute safety that can hinder growth and learning opportunities for students [4][5][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident at Shanghai Jiao Tong University involved a conflict between a parent and a student, raising concerns about campus safety and the implications of open campuses [2][3]. - Opponents of campus openness argue that such incidents highlight potential safety risks and disrupt the educational environment, suggesting a need for more controlled access [3]. Group 2: Arguments for Campus Openness - The article argues that despite safety concerns, universities should remain open, as the current level of openness has not yet returned to pre-pandemic standards [4][5]. - It highlights that the focus should not be on whether to open campuses, but rather on how to do so effectively while fostering a consensus on acceptable risk levels [4][5]. Group 3: Safety vs. Growth - The pursuit of absolute safety can lead to a detrimental "safetyism" mindset, which may deprive young adults of essential experiences needed for resilience and personal growth [5][6]. - The article references the book "The Coddling of the American Mind," which critiques the overemphasis on safety, suggesting that excessive protection can lead to increased fragility among youth [5][6]. Group 4: Societal Impact - The pandemic has heightened societal sensitivity to risks, affecting not only university policies but also educational practices in primary and secondary schools, where safety measures have restricted children's freedom [6]. - The article calls for a shift away from "safetyism" to allow for a more balanced approach to risk, enabling both university students and younger children to grow within a framework of reasonable safety [7].

Core Viewpoint - The debate surrounding the openness of universities is reignited by a recent incident at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, where a conflict between a parent and a student resulted in injury, raising concerns about campus safety and the implications of a more open environment [1][2] Group 1: Arguments for University Openness - Despite the incident, the consensus remains that universities should be open, focusing on how to achieve this openness while ensuring safety [2][3] - The pursuit of absolute safety may lead to excessive restrictions, which could hinder the educational environment and the growth of students [2][3] Group 2: Safety Concerns and Educational Impact - The concept of safetyism can lead to a detrimental impact on educational practices, affecting not only universities but also primary and secondary schools, where excessive caution limits children's growth opportunities [4] - The recent extension of break times for students reflects ongoing discussions about balancing safety with the need for freedom and risk-taking in educational settings [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the detrimental effects of smartphones on teenagers, highlighting a significant increase in mental health issues among youth linked to smartphone usage and social media exposure [1][4][6]. Group 1: Impact of Smartphones on Youth - The Netflix series "Chaos Teen Years" illustrates the violent consequences of online bullying and misogyny, prompting discussions about the dangers teenagers face in their own rooms rather than on the streets [1][2]. - The Australian government has taken legislative action by becoming the first country to set a minimum age for social media use, prohibiting access for those under 16 [2][4]. - The proliferation of smartphones has led to four fundamental harms for teenagers: fragmented attention, social deprivation, sleep deprivation, and addiction [6][7]. Group 2: Academic Insights and Recommendations - Jonathan Haidt's book "The Anxious Generation" reveals a close correlation between the rise of mental health issues in youth and smartphone usage, with a 150% increase in mental health problems in American teens since 2015 [4][6]. - Haidt suggests that children should not have smartphones before the age of 14 and should not have personal social media accounts before 16, advocating for more real-world playtime [8][9]. - The article emphasizes the need for a balance between protecting children from virtual dangers while allowing them to engage in real-world experiences, contrasting the overprotection in physical environments with the underprotection in virtual spaces [9][10].