Group 1 - The article discusses the societal pressure to adopt a "high-energy" lifestyle, which is often portrayed as a path to success and fulfillment [3][4][5] - There is a growing skepticism among individuals regarding the concept of a "high-energy life," questioning whether it is a form of societal dominance that overlooks the struggles of those labeled as "low-energy" [5][6] - The concept of "emotional labor" is introduced, highlighting the invisible effort individuals expend to maintain emotional stability and satisfaction in their work environments [9][10][11] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that emotional labor is prevalent in service industries, where workers often face emotional overload without adequate compensation [10][11] - It points out that younger generations are increasingly rejecting the notion of overexertion and are opting for a "low-energy" lifestyle that prioritizes well-being over relentless ambition [14][15] - The narrative suggests that young people are becoming aware that excessive effort does not guarantee success, leading them to adopt a more balanced approach to life and work [15][16] Group 3 - The "low-energy" lifestyle is characterized by a preference for simplicity, sustainability, and a slower pace of life, which contrasts sharply with the high-energy demands of modern society [19][20][21] - Individuals embracing this lifestyle seek to minimize their emotional and physical exertion, focusing instead on meaningful experiences and connections [22][23][24] - The article concludes with a call for individuals to resist societal pressures to conform to high-energy expectations and instead embrace a more relaxed and fulfilling way of living [26][27]