AI技术造假
Search documents
中国篮球协会声明:坚决反对造谣、抹黑女篮教练和运动员行为
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-12-10 09:50
球 切 声 明 近期,我们关注到一些针对中国女篮教练员和运动员的不实信 息与恶意谣言,甚至利用 Al 技术伪造音视频,侵权造假、进行人身 侮辱、散布虚假信息,挑动对立赚取流量。这不仅对相关教练员和 运动员造成了严重困扰,也干扰了队伍的备战工作,造成了恶劣网 络舆论影响。 根据中国相关法律法规,恶意编造、散布虚假信息,诽谤他人, 已涉嫌侵犯公民个人合法权益。 央视网消息:12月10日,中国篮球协会发布声明:近期,我们关注到一些针对中国女篮教练员和运动员的不实信息与恶意谣言,甚 至利用Al技术伪造音视频,侵权造假、进行人身侮辱、散布虚假信息,挑动对立赚取流量。这不仅对相关教练员和运动员造成了严重困 扰,也干扰了队伍的备战工作,造成了恶劣网络舆论影响。 根据中国相关法律法规,恶意编造、散布虚假信息,诽谤他人,已涉嫌侵犯公民个人合法权益。 中国篮球协会郑重声明:坚决反对歪曲事实、造谣、抹黑、污蔑、煽动情绪对立等无底线博流量行为。对于恶意损害中国女篮成员 及团队形象的行为,中国篮球协会将保留通过法律途径追究其法律责任的权利。 篮球作为一项深受广大人民群众喜爱的运动,承载着重要的社会责任,也凝聚着中国篮球人的奋斗与精神。 ...
治理AI造假起号乱象
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-08-13 22:10
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the misuse of AI technology in social media, particularly in creating fake content, and highlights the Chinese government's efforts to regulate this issue through a special campaign [1]. Group 1: AI Technology Misuse - Social media accounts are utilizing AI technology to create fake content, such as foreign individuals singing Chinese songs and sharing wellness tips, to quickly gain attention and monetize their platforms [1]. - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has launched a special campaign focusing on issues like AI-generated face-swapping and voice imitation, as well as the lack of identification for AI content [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The campaign has effectively curbed the spread of fake news and rumors, significantly enhancing the transparency of AI-generated content and reducing the risk of public deception [1]. - Technology providers are required to strengthen compliance and safety in their research and development to support anti-fraud measures on platforms [1]. Group 3: Future Directions - Regulatory bodies are urged to ensure platforms fulfill their governance responsibilities by establishing a "blacklist" for violators and imposing strict penalties on repeat offenders to disrupt the black and gray market [1]. - Public participation in addressing these issues is encouraged, along with the introduction of professional evaluation to protect the integrity of genuine creative ecosystems while ensuring that technological innovation serves society [1].