Group 1 - The recent popularity of an AI-adapted version of the song "泡沫" has raised questions about copyright infringement and the responsibilities of those involved in the adaptation process [1] - Lawyers indicate that while AI is used for adaptation, the responsibility lies with the person who issued the adaptation command, especially if the adaptation is shared publicly for profit [1] - Platforms hosting such content cannot evade responsibility and must take action against known infringements, as the original creator's rights remain protected even after copyright expiration [1] Group 2 - The legal framework requires original creators to actively request the removal of infringing content, which contributes to the ongoing prevalence of copyright violations on short video platforms [1] - There is a call for regulatory bodies to enhance oversight using technology to prevent copyright infringement at the source, ensuring a safer environment for creators [1] - The potential of AI adaptations is acknowledged, suggesting that they can benefit creators and audiences if managed properly without infringing on artists' rights [2]