近期，有一个"泡沫转场"玩法在社交平台走红，该玩法所使用的背景音乐是经过AI改编的、邓紫棋歌曲 《泡沫》，此AI改编曲引发争议。当前，该歌曲在平台已下架，发布"雷霆版《泡沫》"的一名博主发文 致歉。 AI碧昂斯唱《泡沫》粉丝不满 律师谈：AI改编歌曲存多重风险 AI+音乐当前的发展势头十分迅猛，AI技术在音乐领域的运用具有相当大的潜力，但不当使用带来的风 险和争议也接连不断。 从好的一方面来说，AI技术为音乐发展提供了新的机遇和可能，比如因为原始音源质量不佳、核心成 员去世等原因被搁置了三十年之久的披头士乐队歌曲《now and then》，就是因为AI技术的发展才得以 重新合成约翰·列侬的声音，从而使得这首歌曲得以发行，科技媒体 CNET将之评价为"这可能是 AI 在 音乐行业中争议最小的一次应用了。"AI技术让人们看到了弥补经典乐队遗憾的机会。AI+音乐也可能 诞生意想不到的网络热点，比如洗脑歌曲《技能五子棋》。 但从另一方面来说，AI音乐的发展也面临多重争议，"雷霆版《泡沫》"可以说是多种AI合成音乐争议的 集合体，一方面被质疑侵犯原词曲作者的版权权益，另一方面又克隆了歌手的声音存在人格权侵权可 能。在 ...

转自：四川在线 事实上，邓紫棋等歌手早已声明：自己的作品不授权AI改编。这样的AI改编侵权吗？谁该为这样的"魔 改"担责？今天小铭就邀请四川方策律师事务所律师郭刚来给大家切一切。 郭刚告诉小铭，虽然歌曲是AI改编的，但改编的指令都是由人下达的，因此首先要明确向AI发出指令 的人，为什么改编歌曲。如果只是自己欣赏，那么无伤大雅，但如果公开传播、甚至因此获取流量或金 钱利益，那么无疑侵犯了原创的著作权。在这个过程中，平台不能当"甩手掌柜"，明知这种行为侵权却 以信息量太大等为由失于监管，这就要负起侵权的连带责任。即便著作财产权过期，作者人身权中 的"保护作品完整权"也永久有效。 郭刚提到，根据民法典，现有的侵权发生之后，需要原创者主动向平台提起删除侵权内容的申请，这种 应对侵权行为的滞后性，导致如今短视频平台上侵权行为仍然屡见不鲜。监管部门应当与时俱进，通过 技术手段在源头上加强监管，防患于未然，才能让更多创作者放心、大胆创作。 小铭认为，AI改编本身对于创作者而言并非坏事，关键在于如何用好这个利器，在不侵犯歌手权益的 前提下，让多种风格的作品百花齐放，最终让听众的耳朵受益。对这件事你怎么看？欢迎评论区留言。 四 ...

Core Viewpoint - The concert showcased the versatility of the Morin Khuur, an ancient instrument with over 800 years of history, blending various musical genres and captivating the audience with its modern interpretations [1][2] Group 1: Event Highlights - The concert took place at the Hohhot Sports Center, featuring a high-tech opening with robots leading the countdown [1] - The performance included innovative collaborations, such as the Morin Khuur with cello in "Chorale Song" and harp in "Nomadic Time," revitalizing classic songs [1] - A unique rendition of the folk song "Wild Goose" combined the Morin Khuur with Peking opera elements, showcasing a deep artistic dialogue [1] Group 2: Audience Reception - The concert effectively balanced classical and popular music, resonating emotionally with audiences of all ages, as noted by attendees [2] - Audience member Ms. Bai expressed surprise at the diverse expressive capabilities of the Morin Khuur, indicating a successful engagement with the audience [2] Group 3: Future Plans - The "Impression" Inner Mongolia Morin Khuur concert series is organized by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Publicity Department and is set to begin a national tour by the end of 2025, having already completed three performances [2]

Core Viewpoint - G.E.M.邓紫棋's first solo concert in Sanya, part of her "I AM GLORIA" world tour, adds a vibrant musical atmosphere to the tourist city, showcasing her musical evolution and high-tech stage design [2]. Group 1: Event Details - The concert took place on December 6 and 7 at the Sanya Sports Center, marking邓紫棋's debut performance in Sanya [2]. - The event featured approximately 2 hours of performance, including popular songs like "光年之外" and "泡沫," as well as new tracks from her latest album [2]. - The stage design incorporated high-tech visual elements, creating an immersive audio-visual experience for the audience [2]. Group 2: Audience Experience - Attendees actively participated by waving glow sticks, creating a dazzling atmosphere that complemented the stage lighting [2]. - Audience members expressed excitement about experiencing邓紫棋's live performance in Sanya, highlighting the romantic ambiance of the event [2]. Group 3: Cultural Impact - The concert is part of a broader trend in Sanya, which is increasingly integrating culture and tourism, especially with events like the 7th Hainan Island International Film Festival [2]. - The local government aims to provide diverse and high-quality cultural consumption options for residents and tourists [2].

Core Points - G.E.M.邓紫棋's "I AM GLORIA" world tour concert will take place in Sanya on December 6, 2025, at the Sanya Sports Center [1] - The concert will feature an immersive stage design and will include performances of classic hits as well as new songs from her upcoming album [1] - The event aims to enhance the cultural tourism experience in Sanya and promote local elements through interactive segments [1] Industry Impact - Large-scale concerts are significant drivers of tourism consumption, positively impacting related industries such as accommodation, dining, and transportation [2] - The Sanya Sports Center, a key cultural and sports facility in Hainan Free Trade Port, has successfully hosted multiple large events since its opening in 2023, contributing to the operational efficiency of the venue [2] - The concert is expected to further establish Sanya as an internationally recognized cultural tourism consumption center [2]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing copyright dispute between singer G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and her former company, Hummingbird Music, highlights the conflict between creator rights and capital control in the music industry, reflecting a broader trend of similar disputes globally [2][10]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - G.E.M. claims that after years of signing with Hummingbird Music, she discovered that the copyright of her songs, including popular tracks like "Bubble" and "Together No Matter How Far," does not belong to her [1][4]. - The copyright dispute has lasted over six years, with G.E.M. recently releasing a re-recorded album titled "I AM GLORIA," which includes 12 of her old songs [3][5]. - Hummingbird Music asserts that all music works created during the contract period belong to them, demanding the removal of G.E.M.'s re-recorded album from music platforms [2][9]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Implications - G.E.M. has identified a potential solution to her copyright issues through Article 42 of China's Copyright Law, which allows for "statutory licensing" of music works, enabling her to legally re-record her songs [5][8]. - The statutory licensing provision aims to prevent copyright monopolies and encourages diverse dissemination of works while ensuring that copyright holders receive compensation [6][12]. - The dispute underscores the importance of clear contractual terms regarding copyright ownership, especially in the digital age where creators are more aware of their rights [11][12]. Group 3: Industry Trends and Comparisons - The copyright battle faced by G.E.M. is not an isolated incident; similar cases have emerged globally, such as Taylor Swift's $360 million buyback of her album rights and the issues faced by the band Sodagreen [2][10]. - These disputes reflect a fundamental conflict between traditional "lifetime buyout" copyright models and the emerging awareness of creator sovereignty in the digital era [10][11]. - The complexities of music copyright, which involve various rights types including lyrics, composition, and recording, necessitate that artists pay close attention to contract details to protect their interests [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and Hummingbird Music (蜂鸟音乐) centers around copyright ownership and the legality of her re-recording early works without authorization, which Hummingbird claims infringes on their rights [1][2][5]. Group 1: Copyright Ownership Issues - Hummingbird Music asserts that all music works created by G.E.M. during the contract period from 2007 to 2022 belong to the company [2]. - G.E.M. argues that some works were not explicitly prohibited from being re-recorded at the time of their initial recording, citing the "statutory license" clause in copyright law [3][6]. Group 2: Public Performance Rights - G.E.M. retained public performance rights when she joined the Hong Kong Composers and Authors Society (CASH) at the age of 14, which she uses as a legal basis to bypass Hummingbird's control [4]. Group 3: Financial and Contractual Issues - G.E.M. accuses Hummingbird of withholding royalties for six years and failing to pay service fees prior to contract termination, claiming that Hummingbird no longer has the right to assert copyright control [5]. Group 4: Legal Framework and Statutory License - The statutory license under Article 42 of the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China allows recording producers to use others' works without permission, provided they pay reasonable compensation [6][7]. - The interpretation of the second clause of this article is crucial, as it specifies that only legally recorded and published works are protected, which applies to G.E.M.'s previous recordings for Hummingbird [7][8]. Group 5: International Context of Statutory License - The statutory license system is a significant mechanism in copyright law internationally, aiming to balance creator rights with public interest, with varying applications across countries like the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Japan [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. - The case highlights the need for clearer regulations regarding creator rights and the potential for legislative changes to protect artists better in the future [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by artists in the music industry regarding copyright ownership and the importance of re-evaluating the copyright value system to ensure creators retain their rights and benefits from their works [3][9][37]. Group 1: Artist Experiences - G.E.M. (邓紫棋) signed a contract at 15 that transferred her music copyright and recording rights to her former company, resulting in her not receiving royalties for six years due to ongoing legal disputes [5][6]. - During her legal battle, G.E.M. held a world tour but did not benefit from the streaming revenue of her old songs, as the rights remained with her former company [7][8]. - G.E.M. released a re-recorded album to regain control over her music rights, urging fans to support this new version to diminish the value of the original recordings [11][12]. Group 2: Other Artists' Struggles - Wu Qingfeng (吴青峰) faced a similar situation, where his early contract led to a lengthy legal battle over his music rights, ultimately resulting in him urging fans not to listen to the original versions of his songs [16][17]. - Taylor Swift's experience highlights the issue of losing control over her early albums due to a contract with Big Machine Records, which sold her master recordings to a controversial figure [18][20]. - Swift's strategy of re-recording her albums has proven successful, with her re-recorded album achieving significant sales, demonstrating the potential for artists to reclaim their rights [20][22]. Group 3: Industry Insights - The article emphasizes that many artists, especially in China, often unknowingly relinquish their music rights due to a lack of understanding of contracts, particularly when signed at a young age [27][32]. - The current music industry landscape, influenced by social media and streaming, necessitates a re-evaluation of how artists negotiate their rights, as they can now promote their music independently [37][38]. - The importance of artists understanding their rights and the implications of contract terms is crucial for ensuring they do not lose long-term revenue from their works [37][40].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a copyright dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and her former agency, Hummingbird Music, regarding the rights to her re-recorded songs [1][2] - Hummingbird Music has demanded that all music platforms immediately remove the re-recorded songs, threatening legal action if G.E.M.'s team does not comply within 48 hours [2] - G.E.M. has publicly stated that she will not remove the songs, indicating a strong stance against the demands of her former agency [4] Group 2 - G.E.M. announced the release of her re-recorded album "I AM GLORIA" on June 12, which includes popular tracks that are now part of the copyright dispute [6] - Hummingbird Music claims that the songs in question were created during the contract period and that the original recordings were also released during that time, asserting their ownership rights [1] - Hummingbird Music, established in February 2013, is involved in various entertainment and copyright services, with its legal representative being Su Wanxian [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a copyright dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and her former management company, Hummingbird Music, regarding the ownership of music works created during their contract period [1][2]. Group 1: Copyright Ownership - Hummingbird Music claims that all songs, except for "Sky Has No Limits," "After Meeting," and "Like You," were created during the contract period and that the original recordings were also released during this time [1]. - The company has requested that all music platforms immediately remove the remastered songs and has threatened legal action if G.E.M.'s team does not delete the infringing content within 48 hours [2]. Group 2: G.E.M.'s Response - G.E.M. has publicly stated that she will not remove the songs in question, indicating her intention to continue distributing her music [4]. - On June 12, G.E.M. announced the online release of her re-recorded album "I AM GLORIA," which includes songs that are part of the copyright dispute, such as "Bubble" and "Light Years Away" [6]. Group 3: Company Background - Hummingbird Music's associated company, Guangzhou Hummingbird Music Media Co., Ltd., was established in February 2013 with a registered capital of 500,000 RMB, focusing on various entertainment and copyright services [7]. - The company has registered multiple trademarks related to G.E.M., although many of these trademarks are currently invalid or under review [7].