RT David Sacks (@DavidSacks)I read your post. It claims that the controversy surrounding Anthropic is about AI safety research. This is not true; in fact, it’s misdirection.The real issue is not research but rather Anthropic’s agenda to backdoor Woke AI and other AI regulations through Blue states like California.This is not surprising since Anthropic hired the Biden AI team, which gave us Biden’s Woke AI executive order and the Biden Diffusion Rule.Since President Trump rescinded these biased and burdensom ...

Regulatory Landscape - All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025, with over 1,000 bills in state legislatures [1] - 118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states [1] - There is a lack of agreement on the purpose and goals of these AI regulations [2] - 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups [3] Algorithmic Discrimination & Compliance - Colorado's SB24-205 bans algorithmic discrimination, defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics [4] - Protected characteristics include age, race, sex, and disability; disparate impact based on these factors can lead to prosecution for both AI model developers and deployers [5] - Even race-neutral criteria leading to disparate impact can be deemed discriminatory [6] - Model developers may need to build in a DEI layer to prevent outputs with disparate impact [6]

Regulatory Impact - The EU's AI regulations may be hindering the development of AI companies within the region [1] - Crypto regulations in the EU might be suppressing the growth of crypto companies [1] - Proposed censorship of social media in the EU could negatively impact the presence of social media companies [1] Trend Observation - A pattern of the EU implementing regulations without fostering corresponding company growth is observed [1]