There's so much to talk about this Monday morning. But before we jump into all of it, Tom, just want to get your thoughts on what we are seeing with retail trading as we do come into a big week with Nvidia earnings. >> Sure.And it's been actually the markets have been pretty good. You named the you really did name the top um the top five and of the three uh individual equities, you know, Tesla, Micron, and and Nvidia, um you've seen an incredible amount of action in in in the derivatives market all those. S ...

want to get uh over to find out what to expect in the new year when states actually start to push their own AI regulations forward. Of course, uh the administration trying to stop this from happening, but nonetheless, Emily Wilkins is in Washington DC this morning to join us with more on that. Good morning. >> Good morning, Andrew.Yeah, look, major AI companies, they are preparing for a California law on AI safety to begin to go into effect on January 1st. This seems to be happening regardless of course wha ...

RT David Sacks (@DavidSacks)I read your post. It claims that the controversy surrounding Anthropic is about AI safety research. This is not true; in fact, it’s misdirection.The real issue is not research but rather Anthropic’s agenda to backdoor Woke AI and other AI regulations through Blue states like California.This is not surprising since Anthropic hired the Biden AI team, which gave us Biden’s Woke AI executive order and the Biden Diffusion Rule.Since President Trump rescinded these biased and burdensom ...

Regulatory Landscape - All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025, with over 1,000 bills in state legislatures [1] - 118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states [1] - There is a lack of agreement on the purpose and goals of these AI regulations [2] - 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups [3] Algorithmic Discrimination & Compliance - Colorado's SB24-205 bans algorithmic discrimination, defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics [4] - Protected characteristics include age, race, sex, and disability; disparate impact based on these factors can lead to prosecution for both AI model developers and deployers [5] - Even race-neutral criteria leading to disparate impact can be deemed discriminatory [6] - Model developers may need to build in a DEI layer to prevent outputs with disparate impact [6]

Regulatory Impact - The EU's AI regulations may be hindering the development of AI companies within the region [1] - Crypto regulations in the EU might be suppressing the growth of crypto companies [1] - Proposed censorship of social media in the EU could negatively impact the presence of social media companies [1] Trend Observation - A pattern of the EU implementing regulations without fostering corresponding company growth is observed [1]