The European Commission has opened an investigation into possible anticompetitive practices by Germany's SAP , Europe's largest software maker, related to its popular business management software. ...

Group 1 - Adtech firm Magnite is suing Google following a judge's ruling that Google engaged in anticompetitive practices [6] - The lawsuit is based on allegations that Google maintained a monopoly in the digital advertising space [6]

Legal Action - Proton, a privacy-focused app maker, is suing Apple over alleged anticompetitive practices [1] - The lawsuit concerns alleged anticompetitive practices and fees charged by Apple [1]

Core Points - The Trump administration has dropped a lawsuit against Southwest Airlines regarding chronic flight delays, which was originally initiated by the Biden administration's Department of Transportation (DOT) [1][6][9] - Southwest Airlines expressed appreciation for the DOT's decision to abandon the lawsuit, asserting that it was the correct outcome [2] - The lawsuit accused Southwest of operating multiple chronically delayed flights and disrupting passenger travel, particularly focusing on two flights during the COVID-19 pandemic [2][5] Summary by Sections Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit was filed in January during the final days of the Biden administration, claiming that Southwest Airlines was operating flights that were chronically delayed [2][5] - The two specific flights involved were between Chicago Midway International Airport and Oakland, California, and another between Baltimore and Cleveland, affecting 180 passengers from April to August 2022 [5] Airline's Response - A Southwest spokesperson stated that the delays were due to unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and were often outside of the airline's control [3][4] - The spokesperson highlighted that since the pandemic, Southwest has made significant investments to improve operational reliability, aiming to provide best-in-class service [4] Department of Transportation's Position - The DOT has indicated that the lawsuit "should have never been brought forward" and acknowledged that Southwest has addressed the underlying issues [8] - The DOT emphasized the need for airlines to provide accurate departure and arrival times, which was part of the complaint against Southwest [7]

Core Viewpoint - Apple is seeking to pause a federal appeals court ruling that requires the company to open its App Store to competitors, claiming it could result in "billions" of dollars in annual losses if enforced [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A federal judge found Apple in contempt of a 2021 injunction related to a lawsuit from Epic Games, suggesting potential criminal charges against the company and its executives [1][10]. - The judge's ruling includes a requirement for Apple to cease practices aimed at evading the injunction, such as imposing a new 27% fee on rivals directing customers to make purchases outside the App Store [2][6]. - Apple argues that the court-ordered changes could cost the company "hundreds of millions to billions" of dollars annually, depending on how developers implement them and consumer adoption rates [3]. Group 2: Business Model Impact - The ruling threatens to disrupt Apple's profitable App Store model by allowing competitors like Epic Games, Spotify, and Amazon to direct customers to their own websites for purchases, thereby avoiding Apple's in-app commissions [3][7]. - Apple contends that the judge's order would force the company to provide free access to its products and services, including intellectual property, which it argues is unreasonable [6]. Group 3: Executive Accountability - The judge accused Apple CEO Tim Cook of attempting to circumvent the 2021 injunction and stated that the vice president of finance, Alex Roman, had lied under oath regarding the implementation of the 27% fee [1][10]. - Former Apple senior vice president Phil Schiller had advised against charging a commission on web links, but the current leadership proceeded with the plan [11].