I'm back with my old friend John Fuglesang, author of the brand new book, Separation of Church and Hate: A Sane Person's Guide to Taking Back the Bible from Fundamentalists, Fascists, and Flock Flecing Frauds. In the book's introduction, he lays out his aim. Quote, "The right has turned a movement based on compassion and love into a mean, self-woriing, tax-free clique. The intolerance of right-wing Christianity is what's driving young people away from religion. It's time to take the back Bible back from the ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)If the concept of "race" could define a sin then the Bible would have discussed it. If it was ever going to be an important sin then Chrysotom or Augustine or Aquinas or Luther would have discovered it in the Bible and warned us. But neither the Bible nor these theologians did. Or do you think God intentionally hid important things from us, leaving them out of both the Bible and the great traditional saints and commentators on the Bible, and wants us to be damned for things He did ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)If the concept of "race" could define a sin then the Bible would have discussed it. If it was ever going to be an important sin then Chrysotom or Augustine or Aquinas or Luther would have discovered it in the Bible and warned us. But neither the Bible nor these theologians did. Or do you think God intentionally hid important things from us, leaving them out of both the Bible and the great traditional saints and commentators on the Bible, and wants us to be damned for things He did ...

RT Glenn Lawrence (@mrGlennLawrence)@MattWalshBlog What if I told you that nowhere in the Bible does it call polygyny a sin? And for anyone just call it, a sin is actually adding to the Bible, which is a sin in itself, so let me ask you, Matt is your position on polygyny based on a religious interpretation ...