Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q2 2025, the company reported a net loss of $5.3 million, primarily due to a non-cash unrealized loss of $6.4 million on warrants, while adjusted net income was $1.1 million [3][16] - The net income for the first half of 2025 was $2.6 million, with voyage revenues of $10.7 million for Q2 2025, a slight decrease of 1% from $10.8 million in Q2 2024 [13][20] - The cash balance decreased by 82% to $2.3 million from $12.6 million at the end of 2024, attributed to the payment of $15.1 million for the Eco Spitfire and remaining bunkers [16] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Voyage costs increased to $4.7 million in Q2 2025 from $3.1 million in Q2 2024, due to the addition of the Eco Spitfire [14] - Operating expenses rose to $2.4 million in Q2 2025 from $2 million in Q2 2024, again due to the new vessel [15] - General and administrative expenses increased to $677,000 in Q2 2025 from $603,000 in Q2 2024, mainly due to stock-based compensation [15] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The dry bulk market saw a modest decline of approximately 1% in seaborne trade, with a 5% year-on-year drop in Chinese iron imports [4] - Coal and iron ore imports declined significantly, while grain trade experienced increased ton-mile demand due to trade route realignments [5] - The Aframax tanker market faced bearish conditions due to geopolitical tensions, with oil prices spiking in June 2025 but normalizing thereafter [9] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims for disciplined growth through selective acquisitions of quality non-Chinese-built vessels, focusing on short to medium-term charters [18] - The strategy includes maintaining a high-quality fleet to reduce operating costs and improve safety, which provides a competitive advantage [18] - The company has increased its fleet capacity by over 230% since inception without incurring any bank debt, enhancing financial flexibility [20] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management highlighted the resilience of the company amidst geopolitical factors, environmental regulations, and shifting demand patterns [20] - The company is confident in its adaptability to changing market conditions, which will support the development of existing core businesses and exploration of new growth opportunities [21] - The management emphasized the importance of high standards of safety and reliability in maintaining customer relationships [12] Other Important Information - The company successfully completed the dry docking of the Afrapearl II in August 2025 and settled the final balance of $14.6 million for the Eco Spitfire in April 2025 [20] - The fleet consists of three Handysize dry bulk carriers and one Aframax oil tanker, with an average age of 14.5 years [11] Q&A Session Summary - No specific questions or answers were documented in the provided content, indicating that the call may have concluded without a formal Q&A session.

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q2 2025, the company reported a net loss of $5.3 million, primarily due to a non-cash unrealized loss of $6.4 million on warrants, while adjusted net income was $1.1 million [3][16] - The net income for the first half of 2025 was $2.6 million, with voyage revenues of $10.7 million for Q2 2025, a slight decrease of 1% from $10.8 million in Q2 2024 [13][20] - The cash balance decreased by 82% to $2.3 million compared to $12.6 million at the end of 2024, attributed to the payment of the remaining balance for the Eco Spitfire [16] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Voyage costs increased to $4.7 million in Q2 2025 from $3.1 million in Q2 2024, driven by the addition of the Eco Spitfire [13] - Operating expenses rose to $2.4 million in Q2 2025 from $2 million in Q2 2024, again due to the new vessel [14] - General and administrative expenses increased to $677,000 in Q2 2025 from $603,000 in Q2 2024, mainly due to stock-based compensation [14] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The dry bulk market saw a modest decline of approximately 1% in seaborne trade, with a 5% year-on-year drop in Chinese iron imports [4] - Coal and iron ore imports have declined significantly, while grain trade experienced increased ton-mile demand due to trade route realignments [5] - The Aframax tanker market faced bearish conditions due to geopolitical tensions, but there was a seasonal increase in demand [9] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims for disciplined growth with a focus on acquiring quality non-Chinese-built vessels and maintaining high operational standards [18] - The strategy includes equity issuances for selective acquisitions and chartering to high-quality clients [18] - The company has increased its fleet capacity by over 230% since inception without incurring bank debt, enhancing financial flexibility [20] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management highlighted the resilience of the company amidst geopolitical factors and environmental regulations affecting the shipping industry [20] - The company is confident in its adaptability to changing market conditions and plans to explore new growth opportunities [21] - The performance so far has demonstrated a solid foundation for future growth despite industry challenges [20] Other Important Information - The company successfully completed the dry docking of the Afrapearl II in August 2025 and has no vessels built in Chinese shipyards, mitigating tariff impacts [20] - The fleet consists of three Handysize dry bulk carriers and one Aframax oil tanker, with an average age of 14.5 years [11] Q&A Session Summary Question: What are the impacts of geopolitical tensions on the shipping market? - Management noted that geopolitical tensions have created both challenges and opportunities, particularly in the Aframax tanker market due to shifts in crude flows and sanctions [9][10] Question: How does the company plan to manage its fleet and operational costs? - The company emphasized maintaining a high-quality fleet through regular inspections and a comprehensive maintenance program, which helps reduce operating costs [18]

Corporate Highlights - CMB.TECH completed its merger with Golden Ocean on August 20, 2025, significantly expanding its fleet to approximately 250 vessels, including 89 dry bulk vessels [4][6][18] - The company has declared an interim dividend of USD 0.05, payable on or about October 9, 2025 [9][10] - The Supervisory Board has undergone changes, with Mr. Marc Saverys resigning and Mr. Patrick de Brabandere appointed as chairman [6][21][22] Financial Highlights - For Q2 2025, CMB.TECH reported a net loss of USD 7.6 million, compared to a net gain of USD 184.4 million in Q2 2024 [3][6] - Revenue for Q2 2025 was USD 387.8 million, up from USD 252 million in Q2 2024, while year-to-date revenue reached USD 622.9 million compared to USD 492.4 million in the previous year [5][6] - EBITDA for Q2 2025 was USD 224.1 million, down from USD 261.2 million in Q2 2024 [3][8] Fleet Highlights - The company has a contract backlog of approximately USD 2.93 billion, providing solid revenue visibility [6][27] - CMB.TECH's fleet includes a diverse range of vessels, with over 80 hydrogen- and ammonia-ready vessels, and an estimated fair market value of approximately USD 11.1 billion [27] - The average age of the fleet is 6.1 years, indicating a young and fuel-efficient fleet [27] Market & Outlook - The tanker markets experienced volatility in Q2 2025, with average earnings reaching a five-month low in mid-June but rebounding sharply to USD 47,519/day by June 20 [30] - China's crude oil imports showed a decline in Q2 2025, reflecting a shift in the country's energy demand profile, which may have lasting implications for global oil trade [31][32] - The Capesize market remains supported by strong iron ore demand, particularly from China, which accounted for 76.4% of total seaborne iron ore volumes in H1 2025 [37]

Immigration Detention & Environmental Regulations - A federal judge ordered the "Alligator Alcatraz" detention facility to be shut down within 60 days due to bypassing environmental laws [1] - The ruling stated that Florida officials failed to adequately explain the need for an immigration detention center in sensitive wetlands [1] - The shutdown will require the Department of Homeland Security to transfer detainees to other facilities, which are already over capacity [1] - The decision signals that entities building immigration detention centers must comply with federal environmental protection laws [1] Human Rights Concerns - Concerns exist regarding inhumane conditions in immigration detention centers, including extreme heat, insects, lack of food, and functioning toilets [1] - The administration is carrying out raids at an unprecedented rate, impacting families, communities, and businesses [1] - The government's attempt to deport Kilmergo Garcia to Uganda, a country with documented human rights violations and no cultural or linguistic ties, is criticized [2][3] - The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice are coordinating to deport individuals to third countries with no ties, which is considered unprecedented [4]

Investment Rating - The report provides various investment ratings for Japanese automotive companies, including "Overweight" for Toyota Motor, Suzuki Motor, Yamaha Motor, Isuzu Motors, Denso, Aisin, and Nifco, while "Underweight" is assigned to Nissan Motor and SUBARU [5]. Core Insights - The global auto industry is expected to normalize after overcoming COVID-19 and supply chain issues, with a projected growth rate of approximately 2% CAGR from 2024 [20]. - The report highlights the complexity of the Toyota Group structure, indicating increasing cross-shareholdings among its subsidiaries [7]. - Tariff impacts are noted to be minor in the tire sector, but the competitive environment remains challenging [4]. Coverage Universe & Valuation - Nissan Motor: Underweight, Price: ¥355, Target Price: ¥320, Market Cap: ¥1,318.5 billion, FY24E P/E: NM, ROE: -1.2% [5] - Toyota Motor: Overweight, Price: ¥2,624, Target Price: ¥3,600, Market Cap: ¥41,438.1 billion, FY24E P/E: 6.9, ROE: 13.4% [5] - Mitsubishi Motors: Neutral, Price: ¥432, Target Price: ¥360, Market Cap: ¥631.1 billion, FY24E P/E: 15.4, ROE: 3.7% [5] - Mazda Motor: Neutral, Price: ¥894, Target Price: ¥1,000, Market Cap: ¥564.8 billion, FY24E P/E: 4.5, ROE: 7.3% [5] - Honda Motor: Neutral, Price: ¥1,421, Target Price: ¥1,500, Market Cap: ¥7,500.2 billion, FY24E P/E: 6.4, ROE: 7.5% [5] - Suzuki Motor: Overweight, Price: ¥1,787, Target Price: ¥2,300, Market Cap: ¥3,509.7 billion, FY24E P/E: 8.6, ROE: 14.5% [5] - SUBARU: Underweight, Price: ¥2,625, Target Price: ¥2,500, Market Cap: ¥1,923.9 billion, FY24E P/E: 5.5, ROE: 12.9% [5] - Yamaha Motor: Overweight, Price: ¥1,075, Target Price: ¥1,500, Market Cap: ¥1,103.3 billion, FY24E P/E: 9.7, ROE: 13.3% [5] - Isuzu Motors: Overweight, Price: ¥1,924, Target Price: ¥2,600, Market Cap: ¥1,372.5 billion, FY24E P/E: 9.8, ROE: 9.5% [5] - Denso: Overweight, Price: ¥1,897, Target Price: ¥2,300, Market Cap: ¥5,522.1 billion, FY24E P/E: 13.0, ROE: 8.0% [5] - Aisin: Overweight, Price: ¥1,781, Target Price: ¥2,200, Market Cap: ¥1,440.9 billion, FY24E P/E: 13.4, ROE: 5.2% [5] - Bridgestone: Overweight, Price: ¥6,106, Target Price: ¥6,500, Market Cap: ¥4,357.8 billion, FY24E P/E: 14.7, ROE: 8.0% [5] Earnings Forecast Summary - Toyota's revenue for FY24 is projected at ¥45,095.3 billion, with a YoY growth of 21.4% and a net profit of ¥4,944.9 billion [17]. - Honda's revenue for FY24 is projected at ¥20,428.8 billion, with a YoY growth of 20.8% and a net profit of ¥1,107.2 billion [17]. - Nissan's revenue for FY24 is projected at ¥12,685.7 billion, with a YoY growth of 19.7% and a net profit of ¥426.6 billion [17]. - Suzuki's revenue for FY24 is projected at ¥5,374.3 billion, with a YoY growth of 15.8% and a net profit of ¥267.7 billion [17]. - SUBARU's revenue for FY24 is projected at ¥4,702.9 billion, with a YoY growth of 24.6% and a net profit of ¥385.1 billion [17].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Consolidated revenues for 2024 were $25.1 million, at the lower end of the guidance range of $25 million to $26 million, reflecting a 17% decrease in total APC segment revenue, partially offset by a 2% increase in FUEL CHEM revenue [7][32] - Consolidated gross margin for 2024 marginally decreased to 42% from 43% in the previous year, with a decline in both APC and FUEL CHEM gross margins [33] - Net loss for 2024 was $1.9 million or $0.06 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $1.5 million or $0.05 per diluted share in 2023 [35] Business Segment Data and Key Metrics Changes - FUEL CHEM segment revenue was essentially unchanged at $3.5 million for Q4 2024, while APC segment revenue declined to $1.8 million from $2.8 million in the prior year [27] - APC gross margin declined to 36% from 55%, primarily due to product mix and lower segment revenue, while FUEL CHEM gross margin declined to 45% from 48% [28] - Consolidated APC segment backlog at December 31, 2024, was $6.2 million compared to $7.5 million at the end of 2023, with expectations for backlog improvement through the first half of 2025 [29] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is pursuing additional FUEL CHEM accounts, with a demonstration scheduled for late Q3 2025, and is in discussions to expand its chemical technology in Mexico [11][12] - The global data center power market is expected to expand significantly, with investments in emissions control solutions to address surging electricity demand [15][86] - The company is following opportunities in the municipal solid waste market driven by state-specific regulatory requirements [14] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company aims to exceed $30 million in total revenues for 2025, with expectations that both business segments will outperform their 2024 performance [24] - The company is focusing on the commercialization of its DGI technology, with ongoing demonstrations and discussions in various end markets [22][23] - The company is exploring small acquisitions or licensing opportunities to enhance its market position [114] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism for 2025, citing a strong portfolio of APC business opportunities and a return to normalized operations in FUEL CHEM [9][14] - The company does not expect significant contributions from new EPA regulations but is monitoring the regulatory landscape for potential impacts [16][20] - Management indicated that achieving breakeven on operating income would likely require revenues closer to $33 million to $35 million [112] Other Important Information - The company ended 2024 with cash, cash equivalents, and investments totaling approximately $30 million and no long-term debt [8][36] - SG&A expenses increased to $13.8 million for 2024, reflecting higher employee-related costs [33] Q&A Session Summary Question: Is the $30 million revenue outlook for 2025 based on confidence in securing additional FUEL CHEM customers and APC orders? - Management confirmed that the APC orders are included in the outlook, but contributions from new FUEL CHEM accounts are not expected to be significant in 2025 [44] Question: What is the expected gross margin trend for 2025? - Management anticipates a return to historical gross margins of 49% to 50% for FUEL CHEM, while APC margins are expected to remain in the 35% to 38% range [54][56] Question: Are there any impacts from tariffs on the supply chain? - Management acknowledged potential impacts from steel and aluminum tariffs, which could affect costs but would be passed on to end customers [66] Question: What is the timeline for data center-related orders? - Management indicated that delivery schedules for data center orders would typically be around 40 weeks from order to delivery [104] Question: Is the company considering M&A or stock buybacks? - Management is exploring small acquisitions and licensing opportunities but believes current business momentum will drive shareholder value without the need for buybacks [114][116]