登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 案件所处的诉讼阶段：经开庭审理，公司主张原告元预知技术（深圳）有限公司不具备诉讼主体资 格，并进行了不构成侵权等抗辩。近日，公司收到法院出具的关于上述两案的民事裁定书，原告元预知 技术（深圳）有限公司向法院提出撤诉申请，法院予以准许。此后，埃姆梯尔存储技术（深圳）有限公 司就同一事项（侵害发明专利权纠纷）再次向同一法院起诉，目前法院已立案，尚未开庭受理。 ● 上市公司所处当事人地位：深圳佰维存储科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）为被告一。 ● 本次涉案金额（原告埃姆梯尔存储技术（深圳）有限公司诉讼请求）合计：每个案件律师费等合理开 支暂计人民币608,425元及诉讼费用，两案件合计1,216,850元。 ● 对上市公司的影响：考虑到公司遵守FRAND原则（公平、合理、无歧视原则）且没有明显过错及涉 案专利即将保护期届满等因素，本案预计不会影响公司向客户持续供货能力，涉案金额较低，预计该诉 讼事项对公司本期 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company has received a court ruling allowing the withdrawal of a lawsuit against it, which is not expected to negatively impact its operations or financial status. A new lawsuit has been filed by another entity regarding similar patent infringement claims, but the company believes this will have a minimal effect on its business [2][3][4][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Withdrawal - The original plaintiff, Yuan Yuzhi Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., has withdrawn its lawsuit, which was related to patent infringement claims against the company [2][4]. - The court has approved the withdrawal, and the company asserts that this will not affect its current or future profits [4][6]. Group 2: New Lawsuit Details - A new lawsuit has been filed by Emter Storage Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. regarding similar patent infringement claims, with the same subject matter as the previous case [6][7]. - The total amount involved in the previous lawsuits was approximately RMB 1,216,850, which includes legal fees and litigation costs [3]. Group 3: Company’s Position and Impact Assessment - The company maintains that it adheres to the FRAND principles and has not committed any infringement, which is expected to mitigate the impact of the new lawsuit [7][8]. - The company has a strong patent portfolio with 393 patents, including 171 invention patents, which supports its technological leadership [7]. - The company believes that the new lawsuit will not have a significant adverse effect on its production, operations, or financial condition, as the involved patents are nearing the end of their protection period [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The storage leader Jiangbolong's wholly-owned subsidiary, Yuan Yuzhi Technology, has filed a lawsuit against another listed storage company, Baiwei Storage, over two necessary patent disputes related to eMMC standards, with both parties claiming to fulfill their obligations as patent holders but disagreeing on the negotiation process [1][4]. Group 1: Patent Dispute Details - Yuan Yuzhi Technology claims that the involved patents are necessary for the eMMC standard set by the JEDEC Association, and Baiwei Storage has allegedly infringed these patents by manufacturing and selling products without permission [2][4]. - The original applicants of the two patents in question are Nokia, and after several transfers, the patents are currently licensed to Yuan Yuzhi Technology by Emter Storage Technology [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Framework and FRAND Principles - The eMMC standard is primarily aimed at embedded storage for mobile phones and tablets, and the infringement claims arise from Baiwei Storage's products that comply with this standard [2]. - The FRAND principle, which stands for "Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory," is crucial in this context, requiring patent holders to offer licenses under fair terms and preventing unreasonable expansion of patent rights [3][5]. Group 3: Negotiation Process and Claims - Both companies assert adherence to the FRAND principles, but they disagree on whether Baiwei Storage made mistakes during the licensing negotiations, with Yuan Yuzhi claiming Baiwei acted improperly [4][5]. - Baiwei Storage maintains that it has acted in good faith and cooperated fully during the negotiation process, denying any wrongdoing [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a patent dispute between two leading companies in the domestic storage industry, Shenzhen Jiangbolong Electronics Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Baiwei Storage Technology Co., Ltd., highlighting the implications for the industry and the ongoing trends in patent litigation and technology competition [1][2]. Group 1: Patent Dispute Details - Jiangbolong's subsidiary, Yuan Yuzhi Technology, filed a lawsuit against Baiwei Storage for patent infringement, seeking compensation of 1.21685 million yuan [1]. - The patents in question relate to core technologies for eMMC storage devices, originally owned by Nokia and later transferred to Jiangbolong's affiliates [1]. - Baiwei Storage asserts its compliance with FRAND principles during negotiations and claims insufficient legal basis for the lawsuit [1]. Group 2: Financial Impact and Industry Trends - The amount in dispute represents only 0.79% of Baiwei Storage's Q1 2025 revenue of 1.543 billion yuan, indicating a limited immediate financial impact [2]. - The eMMC technology at the center of the dispute is a mainstream solution in the embedded storage market, with Baiwei Storage's revenue in AI edge storage exceeding 1 billion yuan in 2024, reflecting a 294% year-on-year growth [2]. Group 3: Legal Considerations - The case may focus on three key legal issues: whether the implementation of standard-essential patents constitutes infringement, the reasonableness of licensing fees under FRAND principles, and the conditions for applying injunctions [3]. - Baiwei Storage plans to file for a declaration of patent invalidity and continue developing high-end products like LPDDR5X and PCIe5.0 [3].