Flexible Inflation Targeting
Search documents
SBI transformed from being in loss in 2018 to USD 100 bn company, due to regulatory reforms by RBI: Governor Malhotra
The Economic Times· 2025-11-07 05:57
Core Insights - The transformation of India's banking sector is attributed to a strong regulatory framework and key policy measures introduced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the government, exemplified by the State Bank of India's (SBI) growth from a loss in 2018 to becoming a USD 100 billion company [1][9] Regulatory and Structural Reforms - The introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in 2016 and the establishment of resolution mechanisms have fundamentally transformed India's credit culture, promoting greater discipline among borrowers and improving asset quality across the banking system [2][5][9] - Major reforms aimed at strengthening monetary and macroeconomic stability include the adoption of a flexible inflation targeting regime, deepening of forex markets, and gradual liberalization of the capital account [5][9] Historical Context and Recovery - The period from 2014 onwards marked a foundational restructuring of the financial system, guided by the principle of "never waste a good crisis," particularly during a time when India was categorized among the "fragile five" economies [6][9] - The transformation was driven by measures focused on recognition, resolution, and recapitalization of banks, including the Asset Quality Review (AQR) initiated in 2015, which compelled banks to recognize the true state of their loan books [7][10] Banking Sector Consolidation - The consolidation of 27 public sector banks into 12 by 2020, along with massive recapitalization programs, significantly strengthened balance sheets, enhanced capital buffers, and revived the capacity for healthy lending [8][10] - The evolution of India's financial system necessitates that prudential rulebooks evolve in a calibrated manner, as banks are now stronger, supervision is more alert, and market-based risk transfer is more effective [8][10]
X @Joe Consorti ⚡️
Joe Consorti ⚡️· 2025-08-22 15:45
Monetary Policy - The Federal Reserve has abandoned its 2% inflation target in favor of "flexible inflation targeting" [1] - Low interest rates are now primarily used to manage the national debt [2] - Fiscal dominance is now the prevailing economic condition [3]
高盛:美国经济-美联储沟通存在创新空间
Goldman Sachs· 2025-07-03 02:41
Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework review is ongoing, with a revised "Statement of Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy" expected to be released later this summer [2] - The last framework review in 2020 was influenced by low inflation and concerns about the zero lower bound (ZLB), leading to the adoption of "flexible average inflation targeting" (FAIT) [6][7] - Critics argue that the 2020 changes contributed to high inflation during the pandemic, although Fed officials have defended these strategies [8] - The FOMC is likely to revert to responding to "deviations" from maximum employment and return to flexible inflation targeting as its main strategy [10][12] - Proposed changes to communication practices include providing alternative economic scenarios and linking individual projections for the economy and interest rates [15][37] Summary by Sections Framework Review - The FOMC will announce changes to its communication practices in the fall, with adjustments likely to the consensus statement [5] - The review aims to address the effectiveness of the current framework in light of recent economic challenges [6] Key Changes from 2020 Review - The 2020 review emphasized responding to "shortfalls" from maximum employment and introduced FAIT, allowing inflation to overshoot 2% [7][8] - The FOMC is expected to reconsider the "shortfalls" language and may adopt a more robust approach to inflation targeting [10][12] Proposed Communication Innovations - Proposal 1: Publishing alternative economic scenarios to highlight risks and improve market understanding of the Fed's reaction function [16][17] - Proposal 2: Linking individual economic and interest rate projections to provide clearer insights into participants' reaction functions [37][41]