Financially-stressed middle-class families looking for relief in the latest CPI report probably won't be too happy. ...

Poverty Line and Living Costs - Simplify Asset Management的研究表明，对于一个四口之家来说，更合理的贫困线门槛可能是 14 万美元左右[1] - 该研究基于新泽西州考德威尔或埃塞克斯县的数据，指出儿童保育费用约为 3.2 万美元，住房约为 2.3 万美元，食品为 1.4 万美元，交通约为 1.5 万美元，医疗保健为 1 万美元，其他必需品约为 2.2 万美元，税收为 1.85 万美元[2] - MIT Living Wage Project 的数据显示，美国不同地区的贫困线标准差异很大，从低成本地区的约 8.5 万美元到纽约市等高成本地区的超过 18 万美元不等[3] Benefit Cliffs and Marginal Tax Rates - 官方贫困线与实际生活成本之间的巨大差距，导致家庭收入略高于贫困线时，会面临失去 SNAP 或 EBT 等福利的挑战，形成“死亡谷”或“福利悬崖”，导致实际边际税率可能超过 100%[4] - 家庭收入从 4 万美元增加到 10 万美元，生活水平往往没有实质性改善，甚至难以维持现状[4] Wealth Distribution and Economic Policy - 自里根时代以来，美国经济政策发生了重大转变，导致超过 50 万亿美元的财富从普通劳动人民及其家庭转移到极少数富人手中[9] - 里根政府在 1980 年代放松了反垄断法的执行，导致并购活动激增，加剧了财富转移[9] - 中产阶级占人口的比例从里根上任时的三分之二下降到现在的 45% 左右[10] Housing Market and Generational Wealth - 住房成本的上涨速度超过了通货膨胀，对那些无法拥有住房的人造成了经济压力[22][23] - 千禧一代仅掌握美国 4% 的财富，而 90 年代与他们同龄的人掌握了 22% 的财富[18] - 住房成本挤占了其他领域的消费，对整体经济产生影响[24] Regulatory Frameworks and Housing Scarcity - 住房供应的短缺在一定程度上是由于监管框架人为造成的[26] - 房地产市场的垄断行为，例如 RealPage 的垄断，人为地制造了合谋和租金上涨[25] Potential Solutions and Policy Recommendations - 讨论了解决住房负担能力问题的各种方法，包括监管改革、限制公司和外国人拥有住房，以及政府在住房和医疗保健等领域的干预[29][30][32] - 医疗保健和教育应被视为公共资源[18]

Avalanche: Start with clearing your most substantial debt, then, once it’s settled, use the windfall to aggressively pay down any smaller debts.Snowball: Knock off your smaller debts one at a time to build up momentum — and income — to put towards your biggest debt.Reducing debt, especially consumer debt, could be a great way to secure yourself financially. In 2024, there were 494,201 personal bankruptcy filings in the U.S. — over 60,000 more than the previous year, according to Debt.org (5). Two general st ...

The real American poverty line is closer to $140,000.Inflation in housing, healthcare, and childcare has left the average American earner functionally poor.Here’s why the American "middle class" is gone, and why bitcoin is a lifeline.[Presented by @JoinHorizon] https://t.co/cukqF1UCU8Demetri Kofinas (@kofinas):We’ve created a system where the only way to survive is to be destitute enough to qualify for aid or rich enough to ignore the cost. Everyone in the middle is being cannibalized. The rich know this an ...

in Congress. A retired brigadier general in the Air Force, Bacon was first elected to the House in 2016, the same cycle as Donald Trump's first presidential election. In the decades since, Bacon's become known as one of the few Republicans who's been unafraid to speak his mind based on his principles, his beliefs, and what he thinks is best for his constituents, even if that doesn't sit well with his party.Announcing his retirement, Bacon told the New York Times, quote, "I'd like to fight for the soul of ou ...

Healthcare & Social Welfare Impact - The bill is expected to have a devastating impact on people in San Antonio, Texas, and across the country [3] - Approximately 50% of births in Texas are paid for with Medicaid, indicating a significant reliance on this program [3] - The bill is anticipated to make it harder for people to afford college by cutting financial aid [4] - Access to long-term nursing home care for parents will become more difficult [4] - Individuals who rely on subsidies to afford healthcare insurance through the ACA may face challenges [5] Economic & Political Implications - The bill is characterized as a vast transfer of wealth from the working and middle classes to the wealthiest Americans and corporations [6] - Federal workers in DC who are being laid off may face challenges in obtaining healthcare insurance [6] - Republican colleagues may face adverse impacts for aligning with the president's agenda on this bill [10] - Some Republicans voted in favor of the bill out of fear of political repercussions from Donald Trump [11] Democratic Response & Strategy - Democrats need to effectively communicate how people are losing healthcare coverage and struggling to afford nursing home care [8] - Organizing efforts are necessary to connect the dots between the bill and its negative consequences for the next 17 months before the election [9]