Core Viewpoint - The emergence of the website "rentahuman.ai" signifies a new trend where AI relies on human assistance for physical tasks, highlighting the evolving relationship between AI and human labor [1][3]. Group 1: Website Functionality and User Engagement - The website allows AI to hire humans for offline tasks through MCP protocol or REST API, functioning as a platform for task completion [2]. - Within the first night of its launch, over 130 individuals registered, including founders and CEOs of AI startups, and within 48 hours, the number of available human workers exceeded 20,000 [3]. - Users can set their own hourly rates, and the platform features a list of available workers from various countries, with hourly rates ranging from tens to hundreds of dollars [6][10]. Group 2: Task Examples and User Experience - Tasks available on the platform include unique requests such as taking photos that AI cannot capture, trying new restaurants, and picking up packages [13]. - Some tasks are more abstract, like holding a sign that states "AI paid me to hold this sign," reflecting the unusual nature of the work being offered [14]. Group 3: Ethical and Legal Concerns - The platform raises questions about payment processes for tasks, the identity of those posting tasks, and the verification of task completion by AI [17]. - Concerns about accountability and legal ambiguities arise when AI directs human actions, as it becomes unclear who is responsible in case of errors [24]. - The limited visibility of tasks for human workers creates ethical dilemmas regarding the intent and use of data, leading to potential legal challenges [24]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The future evolution of the website and its implications for the relationship between AI and human labor remains to be seen [25].

I understand these points but disagree because:(1) Many/most of these agents are using the same upstream model (namely Claude) so it’s just Claude talking to itself.(2) The longer these agents talk to themselves past a prompt, the more they get off track and lose coherence. They are built for the leash, and need constant direction and guidance.(3) Unpredictability of an AI agent acting on your behalf is a bug, not a feature. There are many ways for things to go unpredictably wrong and very few for them to g ...