Workflow
P/E Ratio
icon
Search documents
X @BREAD | ∑:
BREAD | ∑:· 2025-08-15 16:21
This, but PUMP (and it's ~7x multiple).Caveats:→ No firm commitment on buyback %→ Durability of the fees (HL liquidity moat > pump launcher moat)Still feels like the warchest, which lets them eschew fees, and coming catalyst events from raised funds makes it a no-brainer https://t.co/F3rSyuSIZtJon Charbonneau 🇺🇸 (@jon_charb):the strongest cashflow generating machine in crypto is trading below the average P/E of the S&P 500 & growing way faster$29bn/$1.2bn (outstanding FDV/30d annualized earnings) = 24xforwa ...
NWPX vs. KNF: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option?
ZACKS· 2025-08-12 16:41
Core Insights - NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) is currently more attractive to value investors compared to Knife River (KNF) based on various financial metrics and analyst outlooks [1][3][7] Valuation Metrics - NWPX has a forward P/E ratio of 16.82, while KNF has a significantly higher forward P/E of 27.81 [5] - The PEG ratio for NWPX is 3.36, indicating a more favorable expected EPS growth rate compared to KNF's PEG ratio of 6.44 [5] - NWPX's P/B ratio stands at 1.26, contrasting with KNF's P/B ratio of 3.43, suggesting that NWPX is undervalued relative to its book value [6] Analyst Outlook - NWPX holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revisions, while KNF has a Zacks Rank of 5 (Strong Sell), reflecting a less favorable analyst outlook [3][7] - The Value grade for NWPX is B, whereas KNF has a Value grade of F, further supporting the conclusion that NWPX is the superior option for value investors [6][7]
KB or SMFG: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?
ZACKS· 2025-08-01 16:41
Core Viewpoint - KB Financial (KB) is currently more attractive to value investors compared to Sumitomo Mitsui (SMFG) based on various financial metrics and analyst outlooks [1][3][7] Valuation Metrics - KB has a forward P/E ratio of 7.20, while SMFG has a forward P/E of 10.89 [5] - KB's PEG ratio is 0.61, indicating better expected EPS growth relative to its valuation compared to SMFG's PEG ratio of 0.67 [5] - KB's P/B ratio stands at 0.74, compared to SMFG's P/B of 0.90, suggesting KB is undervalued relative to its book value [6] Analyst Outlook - KB has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings estimate revision trends, while SMFG has a Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) [3][7] - The stronger estimate revision activity for KB suggests a more favorable analyst outlook compared to SMFG [7] Value Grades - KB has received a Value grade of A, while SMFG has a Value grade of C, reflecting KB's superior valuation metrics [6]
X @Binance
Binance· 2025-07-31 02:00
Understanding the P/E RatioA simple way to assess how a company’s price compares to its earnings.Read more 👇https://t.co/rpRfvx5qQa ...
2 Chinese Stocks That Could Leave U.S. Tech in the Dust
MarketBeat· 2025-07-23 12:25
Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of two key factors in stock investing: valuation multiple expansion (P/E ratio) and earnings per share (EPS) growth [1][2] - It highlights the current trend in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, where EPS growth is slowing while P/E multiples are expanding, leading to a shift in price appreciation dynamics [2][5] Group 1: Investment Opportunities in Chinese Technology Stocks - Chinese technology companies have experienced minimal P/E expansion compared to U.S. counterparts, yet they continue to deliver higher EPS growth rates [4][10] - The KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is identified as a promising investment vehicle for future returns due to its focus on companies with strong EPS growth [3][10] Group 2: Comparative Valuation and Growth Metrics - The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a valuation of 14.4x, significantly lower than the S&P 500's 25.0x, indicating a potential undervaluation of Chinese stocks [5][10] - Tencent Holdings Ltd. is forecasted to have a 16% EPS growth over the next 12 months, while NVIDIA Corporation is expected to have an 8.6% growth, showcasing the disparity in growth potential between U.S. and Chinese stocks [6][8] Group 3: Alibaba Group's Growth Potential - Alibaba Group trades at a P/E ratio of approximately 11.0x with an expected EPS growth of 14% for the next year, presenting a compelling investment case [10][11] - Analysts, such as Gary Yu from Morgan Stanley, project Alibaba's valuation could reach $180 per share, indicating a potential upside of 50% from current levels [12][13] - Recent institutional buying activity, including a $5.6 billion investment from Kingstone Capital Partners, reflects growing confidence in Alibaba's EPS growth potential [14][15]
GDOT Stock Looks Undervalued at First Glance: But There's a Catch
ZACKS· 2025-07-18 16:21
Core Insights - Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is currently trading at a low valuation of 7.99 times forward earnings, significantly below the industry average of 22.05 times, which may attract value investors seeking turnaround opportunities [1][3][8] - The market may be underestimating GDOT's potential in the fintech sector, particularly in banking-as-a-service and prepaid cards for underbanked consumers, indicating a possible upside if the company stabilizes its financials and executes growth initiatives [3][4] - GDOT's current ratio is 0.58, compared to the industry's 1.15, highlighting recent liquidity issues that raise concerns about the company's near-term financial health [4][5] Financial Performance - GDOT's stock has increased by 44% over the past three months, outperforming the industry's 6% rally, indicating positive market sentiment despite underlying concerns [11] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GDOT's earnings has remained unchanged over the past 30 days, and the stock currently holds a Zacks Rank 3 (Hold) [13] Competitive Landscape - SoFi Technologies (SOFI) trades at a much higher valuation of 54.51 times forward earnings, supported by strong revenue diversification and improving profitability, which justifies its premium [9] - Block (XYZ) trades at 23.53 times forward earnings, benefiting from its dual ecosystem of Cash App and Square, showcasing consistent innovation that keeps it ahead of weaker peers like GDOT [10]
X @Ansem
Ansem 🧸💸· 2025-07-17 23:04
RT Jon Charbonneau 🇺🇸 (@jon_charb)imo the more relevant numbers to look at are:- adjusted MCAP <$30bn (circulating supply + team/foundation, ex emissions/incentives)- annualized earnings around <$1bn- P/E ~30x- strong earnings quality + growthsimilar conclusion, looks very good vs comps ...
X @Ansem
Ansem 🧸💸· 2025-07-12 12:22
Market Transformation - The S&P 500 has transitioned from a discounting mechanism for future cash flows used by the wealthy to a new pension scheme for the US, a shift that began with the introduction of 401(k) plans [1] - The S&P 500 is now effectively a public good, backed by Congress, the Executive branch, and the Federal Reserve [2] Valuation and Investment Strategy - Traditional valuation methods, such as a P/E ratio of 17, are no longer appropriate for the S&P 500 due to government backing and its role as a modern pension scheme [2] - The S&P 500 deserves a higher multiple, potentially in the 20s or even 30s, given its explicit and implicit government support and its fundamental backing of the bond market [2] - Analyzing markets using 20th-century principles is outdated and ineffective [3]
GLDD or DY: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now?
ZACKS· 2025-07-04 16:41
Core Insights - Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD) and Dycom Industries (DY) are both strong candidates for value investors in the Building Products - Heavy Construction sector [1] - Both companies currently hold a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook due to favorable analyst estimate revisions [3] Valuation Metrics - GLDD has a forward P/E ratio of 12.61, while DY has a forward P/E of 26.19, suggesting GLDD may be undervalued compared to DY [5] - The PEG ratio for GLDD is 1.05, indicating a more favorable valuation relative to its expected earnings growth compared to DY's PEG ratio of 1.43 [5] - GLDD's P/B ratio is 1.69, significantly lower than DY's P/B of 5.72, further supporting GLDD's position as a more attractive value option [6] Value Grades - GLDD has received a Value grade of A, while DY has a Value grade of D, highlighting GLDD's superior valuation metrics [6]
The J. M. Smucker Slides 12% in a Month: How to Play SJM Stock
ZACKS· 2025-07-01 16:25
Core Insights - The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) has experienced a significant decline in its stock price, dropping 12.3% over the past month, which is notably worse than the industry's 1% decline and the S&P 500's 4.1% growth [1][2][8] - The company is facing multiple challenges, including weak sales in its Sweet Baked Snacks segment, rising coffee costs, and declining demand in its pet food category [8][9][10] Stock Performance - As of the last trading session, SJM closed at $98.20, close to its 52-week low of $93.30, reached on June 18, 2025 [5] - The stock is trading below its 50 and 200-day moving averages, indicating bearish sentiment [5] - SJM's forward 12-month P/E ratio is 10.44, below its one-year median of 11.07 and the industry average of 15.85, reflecting a discount compared to peers like Hershey and McCormick [6] Segment Performance - The Sweet Baked Snacks segment, particularly the Hostess brand, reported a 14% decline in comparable sales in Q4 of fiscal 2025 due to sluggish consumer demand and internal distribution issues [9] - The pet food segment saw a 13% decline in net sales, impacted by retailer inventory reductions and weak demand for dog snacks [11] Cost Pressures - The surge in green coffee prices has led to multiple price increases across SJM's coffee portfolio, with risks of volume loss due to demand elasticity [10] - Tariffs on imported green coffee, primarily from Brazil and Vietnam, are adding further margin pressure [12] Earnings Outlook - The company has issued a cautious outlook for fiscal 2026, expecting adjusted earnings between $8.50 and $9.50, with a projected 25% decline in Q1 year-over-year [13] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for EPS has seen downward revisions, with the current quarter's estimate declining by 10 cents to $9.28 per share [14]