以下文章来源于妙投APP ，作者丁萍 妙投APP . 虎嗅旗下二级市场投研服务品牌，为您提供精选上市公司价值拆解，热门赛道产业链梳理 出品 | 妙投APP 作者 | 丁萍 头图 | AI生图 RWA近日已成为金融圈最炙手可热的叙事之一。 从私人信贷到美国国债，"万物皆可代币化"正被包装成一场价值数万亿美元的数字化迁徙。全球顶级 智库波士顿咨询 （BCG） 预测，到2030年，非标资产RWA细分市场规模或达16万亿美元——这相 当于届时全球GDP的10%。 在这幅繁荣景象背后，市场也发出了疑问：剥开"代币化"、"去中心化"这些技术外衣，RWA的内 核，与当年留下满地鸡毛的P2P，究竟存在多大的本质差异？ 如果说P2P的覆灭，根源是资产不透明和平台失信，那RWA又拿什么来保证，它所锚定的"真实世界 资产"永不为虚？ 当信任的基石从有形的抵押品转向一行行代码，我们迎来的，究竟是一场金融效率 的革命，还是又一次以技术名义包装的金融骗局？ RWA新瓶装旧酒？ 先来看RWA到底是什么？ RWA最原始的定义是"真实世界资产"，是一个名词，指的是现实世界中存在的具体的、有形的 （如 房产、黄金、艺术品等） 或无形的 （如债券 ...

Group 1 - The core concept of RWA (Real World Assets) is the tokenization of tangible and intangible assets, allowing them to be fractionalized and traded on blockchain platforms, potentially reaching a market size of $16 trillion by 2030, which is about 10% of global GDP [1][2][3] - RWA aims to provide a financing channel for asset holders and lower investment barriers for investors, echoing the goals of P2P lending but with a more reliable and transparent mechanism [3][4] - RWA utilizes blockchain technology and smart contracts to enhance transparency and security, addressing issues that plagued P2P lending, such as credit risk and information opacity [5][6][7] Group 2 - Despite improvements, RWA still faces risks related to the authenticity of underlying assets, as blockchain cannot verify the existence of off-chain assets, leading to potential issues with "fake" or low-quality assets [8][9] - The global nature of RWA introduces new complexities in risk management, as assets can be tokenized and sold across borders, creating challenges in regulation and legal recourse for investors [10][11] - RWA is increasingly influenced by state-level actors, with significant participation from government-backed assets like U.S. Treasury bonds, indicating its role as a geopolitical tool in the digital finance landscape [12][13] Group 3 - The rise of RWA could lead to a structural shift in global finance, potentially undermining local currencies and monetary policies as capital flows towards dollar-denominated assets [14][15] - Some regions are exploring local stablecoins to mitigate risks associated with RWA, aiming to maintain financial sovereignty while adapting to the evolving digital finance ecosystem [15][16] - Ultimately, RWA represents a convergence of financial technology, geopolitical strategy, and the quest for monetary authority, posing both opportunities and challenges for individual investors [16]

Core Insights - RWA (Real World Assets) has emerged as a hot topic in the financial sector, with predictions from BCG estimating the market size could reach $16 trillion by 2030, equivalent to 10% of global GDP [1] - The article raises questions about the fundamental differences between RWA and the failed P2P lending model, particularly regarding asset transparency and trust [1][5] - RWA is defined as the tokenization of tangible and intangible assets, allowing for fractional ownership and broader participation in investments [3][4] Group 1: RWA Definition and Mechanism - RWA refers to tangible assets like real estate and gold, as well as intangible assets like bonds and intellectual property [1] - The tokenization process allows traditional assets to be divided into smaller shares, making them accessible to a wider range of investors [3] - RWA utilizes blockchain technology and smart contracts to enhance transparency and automate transactions, reducing reliance on traditional financial intermediaries [4][7] Group 2: Comparison with P2P Lending - RWA is seen as an evolution of the P2P model, addressing issues of credit risk and information opacity by using verified assets as collateral [4][6] - Unlike P2P, which relied on borrower creditworthiness, RWA uses tangible assets to ensure reliability and control over risks [4][6] - The global nature of RWA introduces new risks, as it can lead to a "legal island" scenario where regulatory oversight becomes complicated [10][11] Group 3: Market Dynamics and Geopolitical Implications - The RWA market is significantly influenced by state-backed assets, with a notable share of the market being driven by U.S. Treasury tokenization [12][13] - RWA facilitates capital flow into U.S. assets, potentially undermining the financial sovereignty of non-U.S. economies [13][14] - Countries are facing a dilemma between embracing RWA for economic benefits and protecting their financial systems from external influences [15][16] Group 4: Risks and Challenges - Despite improvements over P2P, RWA still faces risks related to asset authenticity and liquidity, particularly with non-standardized assets [6][9] - The potential for "pseudo-RWA" projects that lack real asset backing poses a significant threat to investors [8] - The article emphasizes the need for investors to understand the underlying assets in RWA investments to avoid pitfalls similar to those experienced in P2P lending [17]