Workflow
Reputational risk
icon
Search documents
FDIC moves to limit penalty-bearing actions
Yahoo Finance· 2025-10-07 12:21
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. proposed a measure Tuesday that would limit the actions for which examiners could issue warnings to banks or impose penalties on them. Examiners will be expected to focus on matters that materially affect a bank’s risk of failure, or would impose costs on the Deposit Insurance Fund, instead of “a litany of process-related items tha ...
JPMorgan and Bank of America ‘debanked' Trump under pressure from Biden admin: Sources
New York Post· 2025-08-05 19:19
Core Viewpoint - JPMorgan and Bank of America "debanked" former President Trump due to pressure from the Biden administration's banking regulators and the Federal Reserve, linked to his involvement in the January 6 Capitol events [1][2][5]. Group 1: Reasons for Debanking - The decision to debank Trump was influenced by concerns over reputational risk, as regulators warned that banking Trump could lead to regulatory scrutiny and potential penalties [2][6]. - Banking executives reported feeling pressured by regulators to avoid business with individuals associated with controversial political actions, including those involved in the January 6 protests [2][4]. Group 2: Trump's Response and Future Actions - Trump has publicly stated his intention to end the practice of politically motivated debanking and plans to issue an executive order to address this issue [3][12]. - Trump criticized the CEOs of JPMorgan and Bank of America for not supporting him after he left office, despite having significant assets and a long-standing relationship with these banks [11][14]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, FDIC, and Federal Reserve have been noted for their ambiguous enforcement of rules regarding reputational risk, which has led banks to adopt a cautious approach towards certain clients [2][8]. - The current regulatory climate has made it easier for banks to avoid potential reputational risks by denying services to individuals like Trump, even when they possess substantial financial resources [6][8].