Core Viewpoint - The Enphase Energy class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding their financial and operational prospects, leading to significant stock price declines following the disclosure of negative financial results [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc., and it involves purchasers of Enphase Energy securities from April 22, 2025, to October 28, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until April 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Enphase Energy overstated its ability to manage channel inventory and mitigate the effects of the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On October 28, 2025, Enphase Energy reported that elevated channel inventory would lead to lower battery storage shipments in Q4 2025 and that the expiration of the 25D Credit would negatively impact revenues in Q1 2026 [4]. - Following this announcement, Enphase Energy's stock price fell by more than 15% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Enphase Energy securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm to litigate the case [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Schall Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duty by the directors and management of Mister Car Wash, Inc. in light of a significant acquisition offer from its largest shareholder, Leonard Green & Partners [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation aims to determine if the board of Mister Car Wash breached its fiduciary duties to shareholders [2]. - Leonard Green & Partners has proposed to acquire all outstanding shares of Mister Car Wash at a price of $7 per share, which represents a 16% premium over the share price prior to the announcement [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Schall Law Firm offers free consultations to discuss shareholder rights and is actively representing investors in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation [3].

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Class A common stock of Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) between June 27, 2023 and the close of the market on February 28, 2024 (4:00 p.m. ET). Snowflake describes itself as a "software company that provides cloud data storage that enables customers to consolidate data onto data- driven applications and share data for the purpose of running analytics and other processes.†For ...

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 24, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) securities between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025. BellRing develops, markets, and sells "convenient nutrition" products such as ready-to-drink (“RTD”) protein shakes, powders, bars, and other protein enriched food products, primarily under the brand name Premier Protein. For more information, submi ...

Core Viewpoint - The Navan class action lawsuit alleges that Navan, Inc. and its executives misled investors regarding the company's financial health and future expenses during its IPO, leading to significant stock price declines after the IPO [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to represent purchasers of Navan, Inc. common stock related to its IPO on October 31, 2025, where nearly 37 million shares were issued at $25.00 per share [1][2]. - The lawsuit claims that the offering documents were materially false or misleading, particularly regarding a 39% increase in sales and marketing expenses shortly after the IPO [3][4]. - Following the earnings report on December 15, 2025, which revealed increased expenses to nearly $95 million, Navan's stock price fell nearly 12% [4]. Group 2: Stock Performance - By the time the lawsuit commenced, Navan's stock price had dropped to as low as $9.20 per share, representing a nearly 63% decline from the IPO price of $25.00 [5]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Navan common stock during the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [6]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can choose a law firm to litigate the case [6]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [7]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [7].

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) securities between April 22, 2025 and October 28, 2025. Enphase is a global energy technology company focusing on solutions for solar generation, storage, and communication. For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003. The Allegations: Robbins ...

PLUG CLASS ACTION: Plug Power Investors with Significant Losses Should Contact Robbins LLP for Information About Recovering Their Losses [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationSAN DIEGO, Feb. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- [Robbins LLP] reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG) securities between January 17, 2025 and November 13, 2025. Plug Power provides hydrogen fuel cell turnkey solutions for the electric m ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ardent Health class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding financial practices and liability reserves, leading to significant stock price declines after revelations of financial discrepancies [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Postiwala v. Ardent Health, Inc., and it involves purchasers of Ardent Health securities from July 18, 2024, to November 12, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until March 9, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Ardent Health and its executives [1]. Group 2: Allegations Against Ardent Health - The lawsuit alleges that Ardent Health did not rely on accurate methods for determining the collectability of accounts receivable, leading to inflated financial reports [3]. - It is claimed that Ardent Health's accounts receivable framework allowed for delayed recognition of losses, resulting in materially misleading financial positions [3]. - The company allegedly lacked sufficient professional malpractice liability insurance and reserves to cover claims, particularly in the New Mexico market [3]. Group 3: Financial Impact - On November 12, 2025, Ardent Health reported a $43 million decrease in third-quarter revenue due to revised accounts receivable collectability assessments [4]. - The company also cut its 2025 EBITDA guidance by approximately 9.6%, from a range of $575 million - $615 million to $530 million - $555 million, citing industry-wide cost pressures [4]. - Following these announcements, Ardent Health's stock price fell nearly 34% [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Varonis Systems, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading investors regarding its revenue outlook and growth potential, leading to significant stock price declines following disappointing financial results [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Molchanov v. Varonis Systems, Inc., and it involves purchasers of Varonis common stock from February 4, 2025, to October 28, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until March 9, 2026, to apply for lead plaintiff status in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Varonis and its executives violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1]. Group 2: Allegations Against Varonis - The lawsuit claims that Varonis misrepresented its revenue projections and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [3]. - It is alleged that Varonis' optimistic reports regarding growth and sales effectiveness were not reflective of the company's actual performance [3]. - Following the release of third-quarter results on October 28, 2025, which fell short of expectations, Varonis lowered its full-year guidance, resulting in a nearly 49% drop in stock price [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Varonis stock during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can choose a law firm for litigation [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the firm handling the case, is a leading class action firm with a strong track record in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against PayPal Holdings, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors about its Branded Checkout offerings and growth projections [1] Group 1: Allegations and Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that PayPal misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [1] - The complaint indicates that the growth targets set for 2027 were unrealistic and not achievable under the leadership of former CEO Chriss [1] - Following the release of disappointing financial results on February 3, 2026, PayPal's stock price dropped from $52.33 to $41.70, a decline of approximately 20.31% in one day [1] Group 2: Company Leadership Changes - The announcement of disappointing financial results coincided with the news that Enrique Lores would replace Chriss as President and CEO, effective March 1, 2026 [1] Group 3: Class Action Participation - Shareholders who purchased PayPal securities between February 25, 2025, and February 2, 2026, may be eligible to participate in the class action [1] - Interested shareholders can contact Robbins LLP to serve as lead plaintiff or remain as absent class members without participating in the case [1]