Anderson, if you scan the headlines here, you um cringe to think about what the world's largest newspapers will tell their people about America right now. But this is a couple of them. Trump tells top brass US cities should be military quote training grounds. Uh novice defense secretary lectures the brass on what it takes to win. Um, what does the world see when they look um to that not so shiny city on a hill right now? Unfortunately, they're probably laughing. I mean, our enemies are taking great solace i ...

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has proposed a deal that would reduce Chinese ownership of TikTok in the US to 20%, but uncertainties remain regarding the execution and implications for American users [3][4]. Group 1: Deal Structure and Participants - The proposed deal requires Chinese owner ByteDance to divest its US operations, which necessitates approval from the Chinese government, complicating the situation amid ongoing trade tensions [4]. - Key investors in the deal include Oracle CEO Larry Ellison and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, indicating potential political ties and influence in the arrangement [6][8]. - The deal is valued at $14 billion, which is considered low compared to Twitter's $44 billion valuation, raising questions about the financial terms and ByteDance's retained value through licensing [11][12]. Group 2: Political and Social Implications - Concerns have been raised about a potential conservative shift in TikTok's management and content moderation, reflecting broader trends in social media under current political dynamics [9][10]. - The deal's vague assurances regarding US national security have led to skepticism among lawmakers, with calls for oversight and scrutiny of ByteDance's past actions [14]. - The extension of the deadline to ban TikTok until mid-January adds to the confusion surrounding the deal's status and compliance with US laws [13].