Group 1 - The Hong Kong IPO market in 2025 led the global capital markets with 114 companies raising approximately HKD 121.16 billion in listing fees, a year-on-year increase of HKD 64.62 billion, with listing fees accounting for about 4.24% of the total fundraising amount [1] - The top four IPO sponsors in 2025 were all Chinese firms, with CICC leading by sponsoring 41 companies, followed by CITIC Securities with 32, Huatai International with 22, and China Merchants International tied with Morgan Stanley at fourth place [2][3] - The participation of Chinese brokers in IPO sponsorship was significantly higher than that of foreign institutions, with only Morgan Stanley being the sole foreign firm in the top five [2][3] Group 2 - In 2025, 27 brokers acted as stabilizing agents for IPOs, with CICC leading by stabilizing 30 IPOs, followed by CITIC Securities with 16, and Morgan Stanley with 9 [4] - A total of 140 brokers participated as underwriters in the Hong Kong IPO market, with Futu Securities involved in 54 IPOs, followed closely by Agricultural Bank of China International with 53 [4] - The "Big Four" accounting firms dominated the auditing market for IPOs, collectively participating in 87% of the projects, with Ernst & Young leading by auditing 41 IPOs [5][6] Group 3 - In 2025, 34 mainland law firms provided legal services for Hong Kong IPOs, with Jingtian Gongcheng leading with 47 projects, doubling its participation from the previous year [7] - A total of 122 overseas law firms were involved in providing legal services for IPOs, with the top three being King & Wood Mallesons, DLA Piper, and Clyde & Co [9] - Eight industry consultants participated in 113 IPOs, with Frost & Sullivan being the most active, involved in 82 projects, capturing a market share of 73% [9]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Carvana Co. due to allegations of materially misleading business information being issued to the investing public [1]. Group 1: Investigation and Allegations - The investigation is prompted by a report from a short seller that claims Carvana's earnings are significantly dependent on private companies linked to its controlling shareholders [3]. - Following the release of this report, Carvana's stock price experienced a decline of 14% on January 28, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased Carvana securities may be eligible for compensation through a class action lawsuit, with no out-of-pocket fees due to a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [2]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Blue Owl Capital Inc. securities between February 6, 2025, and November 16, 2025, of the February 2, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Blue Owl securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by February 2, 2026 [2] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Blue Owl made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues, including pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions and undisclosed liquidity issues [4] - It is claimed that Blue Owl was likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs, and that the defendants downplayed the severity of these issues, leading to materially misleading statements about the company's business and prospects [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Coupang, Inc. securities between August 6, 2025, and December 16, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Coupang securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by February 17, 2026 [3] - The lawsuit alleges that Coupang made false and misleading statements regarding its cybersecurity protocols, which allowed unauthorized access to sensitive customer information [5] Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4] - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, including a record settlement against a Chinese company [4] Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that Coupang's inadequate cybersecurity measures led to a data breach that was not reported in compliance with SEC regulations, resulting in misleading public statements [5]

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CoreWeave, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of investors who purchased CoreWeave securities between March 28, 2025, and December 15, 2025 [2] - The lawsuit alleges that CoreWeave's management issued false and misleading statements regarding the company's ability to meet customer demand and understated risks associated with reliance on a single third-party data center supplier [3] Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that CoreWeave overstated its capability to meet customer demand for its services [3] - It is alleged that the company materially understated the risks posed by its reliance on a single third-party data center supplier, which could negatively impact revenue [3] Next Steps - Investors who suffered losses and wish to learn more about their rights or the claims can contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. for further information [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Coupang, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors about its cybersecurity measures during the Class Period from May 7, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [1][2] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Coupang maintained inadequate cybersecurity safeguards, exposing the company to a heightened risk of a data breach [2] - In November 2025, disclosures revealed a data breach that compromised sensitive personal information of over 33 million customers, leading to significant declines in Coupang's stock price [3] - The breach is noted as the largest cybersecurity event to impact South Korea, with Coupang acknowledging the incident on December 16, 2025 [3] Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Coupang securities during the Class Period have until February 17, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2] - The law firm Berger Montague is leading the class action and has extensive experience in complex civil litigation and class actions [4]

Billionaire Walter Wang, chairman and chief executive of privately held JM Eagle, at the pipe maker's headquarters on June 29, 2020. (Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times) A Los Angeles pipe manufacturer that has been sued thousands of times for allegedly causing asbestos-related disease in workers handling its products is accusing a leading law firm of filing fraudulent cases. J-M Manufacturing, which does business as JM Eagle, filed a federal RICO lawsuit Wednesday in Illinois alleging the Gori Law Firm i ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of America's Car-Mart, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued to the investing public [1]. Group 1: Legal Action and Investor Rights - Investors who purchased America's Car-Mart securities may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement, with no out-of-pocket costs [2]. - A class action is being prepared by Rosen Law Firm to seek recovery of investor losses [2]. Group 2: Company Performance and Market Reaction - On September 4, 2025, America's Car-Mart reported a first-quarter loss of 69 cents per share, compared to a net loss of 15 cents per share in the same period the previous year [3]. - Following the release of these results, America's Car-Mart's stock experienced a decline of 18.2% on the same day [3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Fermi Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of securities fraud related to its Project Matador campus, with significant implications for investors who purchased shares during the specified class period [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Fermi securities between September 28, 2025, and December 11, 2025, alleging that the company overstated tenant demand for its Project Matador campus [3]. - Allegations include the reliance on a single tenant's funding commitment for financing the construction of Project Matador and the risk of that tenant terminating its funding commitment [3]. - Fermi's share price dropped significantly after the announcement that the first tenant had terminated a $150 million funding agreement, leading to a decline of approximately 33.8% from $15.25 to $10.09 per share [4]. Group 2: Investor Actions - Investors who suffered losses on their Fermi investments have until March 6, 2026, to request lead plaintiff appointment, which is crucial for overseeing the litigation [2]. - Individual investors can be appointed as lead plaintiffs, influencing key decisions in the lawsuit [2]. - Interested parties are encouraged to contact Kirby McInerney LLP for more information regarding their rights and interests in the lawsuit [5].

As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 16, 2026 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Registration No. 333-290905 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Amendment No. 3 To Form S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 White Pearl Acquisition Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) British Virgin Islands 6770 N/A (Primary Standard Indust ...