And then there's Trump's other other very I guess personal attorney Elena Haba. Trump appointed her to be the interim US attorney for New Jersey despite a complete lack of qualifications for the job and a history of saying things like this. I'll tell you something.Somebody said to me, Alina, would you rather be um would you rather be smart or pretty. And I said, oh, easy. Pretty.I can fake being smart. I don't know if you can, Alina. That's the thing.Now, US attorneys are really not supposed to be lackeyis ...

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating RXO, Inc. for potential violations of federal securities laws related to misrepresentation or failure to disclose material information to investors [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on whether RXO, Inc. or its officers and directors misrepresented or failed to disclose important information to investors [1] - Individuals who purchased RXO securities and experienced losses are encouraged to join the investigation [2] Group 2: Whistleblower Information - Individuals with nonpublic information about RXO are advised to consider assisting the investigation or utilizing the SEC Whistleblower program, which may offer rewards up to 30% of successful recoveries [3] Group 3: About Johnson Fistel, PLLP - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in shareholder rights, with offices across multiple states [4] - The firm has been ranked in the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms by ISS Securities Class Action Services in 2024, recovering approximately $90,725,000 for clients [5]

AI转型与策略 - 行业 North Star 从 "helpfulness"（有用）转变为 "productive"（生产力），要求 AI 系统生成输出和决策 [1][7] - Agentic AI 被视为一个可调节的 spectrum，根据用例调整 autonomy（自主性）、context（上下文）、memory（记忆）和 coordination（协调）等 levers [9][10][11][12][13] - 构建 Agentic AI 系统时，应着眼于整个问题，而不是过度关注 MVP（最小可行产品），构建完整系统后再进行优化 [21][31] 行业应用与技术 - Thomson Reuters 拥有 4,500 名领域专家，并拥有超过 1.5 terabytes 的专有内容，为软件产品提供支持 [4] - Thomson Reuters 每年在 AI 产品开发上投入超过 2 亿美元 [5] - 通过分解传统应用程序，将组件作为工具提供给 agents 使用，为旧系统注入新的活力 [20][31] 评估与挑战 - Evals（评估）是 AI 开发中最困难的部分，用户期望确定性，但这与 AI 系统的运作方式不符 [15] - 人工评估结果存在高度 variability（变异性），即使是同一批领域专家，对相同数据的评估结果也会有 10% 以上的波动 [15] - 在构建具有更高 agency（代理能力）的系统时，引用源材料变得更具挑战性，agents 可能会出现 drift（漂移），难以追踪原因 [17]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of professional skills and experience in the legal profession, suggesting that success is not determined by initial resources or connections, but rather by one's ability to manage cases and client relationships effectively [5][6]. Group 1: Challenges in the Legal Profession - Many new lawyers feel disadvantaged due to a lack of background and resources, leading to a perception of being at a disadvantage from the start [2]. - The legal industry does not have a clear starting line; success is based on individual capabilities rather than initial conditions [3]. Group 2: Importance of Professional Development - Clients prioritize a lawyer's experience, case history, and professional capabilities over their initial connections or resources [5]. - Instead of focusing solely on finding clients, new lawyers are encouraged to enhance their skills through structured training programs that teach effective case management and client relationship strategies [6]. Group 3: Training Program Details - A 27-day training camp is proposed, focusing on essential skills for lawyers, including self-management, risk assessment, and effective communication [11][12]. - The training includes various modules covering topics such as legal writing, contract drafting, and industry-specific knowledge, aimed at improving overall professional competence [11][12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of professional skills and experience in the legal profession, suggesting that success is not determined by initial resources or connections, but rather by one's ability to manage cases and client relationships effectively [5][6]. Group 1: Industry Insights - The legal profession lacks a clear starting point, meaning that success is not solely based on initial advantages such as background or resources [3][2]. - Clients prioritize a lawyer's experience, case history, and professional capabilities over their initial connections or resources [5]. - Continuous self-improvement and learning from seasoned professionals are crucial for success in the legal field [6]. Group 2: Training Program Details - A 27-day training program is introduced, aimed at enhancing practical legal skills and knowledge [7]. - The program includes various modules covering essential topics such as self-management, professional qualities, risk assessment, and effective communication [11][12]. - Participants can earn rewards such as cash incentives and access to useful legal templates by completing training tasks [9][12].

Core Viewpoint - The Compass Diversified class action lawsuit alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the company and its executives, primarily related to misleading financial statements and irregularities in its subsidiary, Lugano Holdings [1][4][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled Augenbaum v. Compass Diversified Holdings, No. 25-cv-01003 (C.D. Cal.) and seeks to represent purchasers of Compass Diversified Holdings publicly traded securities [1]. - The class action lawsuit claims that Compass Diversified made false statements and failed to disclose significant financial irregularities related to Lugano Holdings, which affected the reported financial results for fiscal 2024 [4][5]. - The lawsuit was initiated after Compass Diversified announced the need to restate its 2024 financial statements due to identified irregularities in Lugano's accounting practices, leading to a stock price drop of over 62% [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - The acquisition of Lugano Holdings was announced on September 7, 2021, with an enterprise value of $256 million [3]. - Following the announcement of the need for financial restatement, Compass Diversified's stock experienced a significant decline, indicating a loss of investor confidence [5]. Group 3: Legal Representation - The plaintiffs are represented by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, a law firm with extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions, particularly those involving financial fraud [6][8]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases in 2024 alone [8].

Industry Recognition - Forbes releases list of top lawyers in Minnesota [1] Legal Profession - Identification of leading legal professionals within a specific geographic region [1]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Avis Budget Group, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Avis Budget securities between February 16, 2024, and February 10, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by June 24, 2025 [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Avis Budget made false and misleading statements regarding its fleet rotation plan, which negatively impacted the value of its vehicles and led to billions in impairment charges [5]. - The claims suggest that Avis Budget's financial and business prospects were overstated, resulting in investor damages when the true information became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Perpetua Resources Corp. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on May 20, 2025 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Perpetua securities between April 17, 2024, and February 13, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by May 20, 2025 [3] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4] Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Perpetua's management provided misleading information regarding the expected initial capital expenditure for the Stibnite Gold Project, downplaying the impact of inflation and other cost factors [5] - The misleading statements led investors to purchase Perpetua's securities at artificially inflated prices, resulting in damages when the true costs were revealed [5]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been initiated against NET Power Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired securities between June 9, 2023, and March 7, 2025, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business and operations [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover losses for investors during the specified Class Period [1]. - Investors wishing to act as lead plaintiffs must file a motion by June 17, 2025 [1]. Allegations Against NET Power Inc. - The Complaint claims that NET Power's management made false statements about the completion timeline and costs associated with Project Permian, citing supply chain issues and site-specific challenges [2]. - It is alleged that the company's projections regarding the time and capital required for Project Permian were unrealistic [2]. - The increased time and capital requirements are expected to negatively impact the company's business and financial results [2]. - Overall, the public statements made by the defendants are claimed to be materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [2]. Law Firm Background - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a recognized law firm specializing in shareholder rights and securities class action lawsuits, with multiple offices across the United States [3]. - The firm has a track record of recovering significant amounts for clients, having recovered approximately $90,725,000 in 2024 for aggrieved clients [4].