市水产科学研究所党支部积极培育"鱼跃春城"党建品牌，推动党员在攻坚克难和服务基层中发挥先锋模 范作用，支部典型经验参与市直机关党建交流展示，土著鱼类繁育和放流工作在云南省长江禁渔考核中 获得加分，滇池土著鱼类保护成效获肯定。 市技术合同认定登记站党支部做实"科创服务，为技术市场护航"党建品牌，设置"党员示范服务窗口"， 搭建"一站式"服务惠民阵地。党员带头开展"政策直通车，服务零距离"上门服务58场，创新大额技术合 同"四站会商"模式，推动单笔超5000万元合同登记8项；2025年合同成交额达205.46亿元，全市技术合 同认定成交额持续稳步增长。 市科技局有关负责人表示，今年，全市科技系统将坚持政治建设常态化，提升"凝心铸魂"的引领力；坚 持组织建设标准化，提升"固本强基"的组织力；坚持党建融合特色化，提升"赋能发展"的推动力；坚持 活动形式多样化，提升"创新有为"的战斗力。 本报讯 记者张怡报道 1月22日，市科技局召开2025年度基层党组织书记述职评议考核暨直属事业单位述 法考评会议，通过亮成效、查不足、谋思路，以党建助力创新事业发展。 2025年，市科技局机关第二党支部围绕"创新引领·科技兴昆"品牌培 ...

Core Viewpoint - Temasek, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund, has seen its investment scale in startups shrink by nearly 90% compared to three years ago, prompting a strategic reassessment due to significant losses from high-profile failures like FTX and eFishery [1][2][11]. Investment Scale and Strategy Adjustment - Temasek's investment scale dropped from $4.4 billion in 2021 to $509 million last year, with only $7 million invested in the first five months of this year [11]. - The number of first-round investment projects decreased from 82 in 2021 to 11 last year, indicating a cautious approach towards early-stage investments [11]. - The average due diligence period for startups has been extended to 10 months, reflecting a more rigorous investment process [10]. High-Profile Failures - Temasek was significantly impacted by the collapse of FTX, where it invested $275 million, resulting in a total loss after the company's bankruptcy [6]. - Another notable failure was eFishery, which faced bankruptcy due to fraud allegations, leading to severe financial losses for Temasek [7]. Internal Reflection and Accountability - Following the investment failures, Temasek initiated internal reviews and held senior management accountable by reducing their compensation [10]. - The organization is shifting its strategy to focus more on indirect investments through venture capital funds and prioritizing investments in companies closer to going public [10]. Broader Implications for State-Owned Investment Institutions - Temasek's situation serves as a cautionary tale for domestic state-owned investment institutions, which have increasingly dominated the investment landscape, particularly in technology sectors [13][14]. - The trend of state-owned entities leading investments raises concerns about risk aversion and the balance between government strategic goals and investment returns [14][15].