（来源：泰林生物） 12月8-10日，为期三天的2025第二届高品质制水与高质量供水发展论坛在济南顺利举办。论坛邀请哈尔滨工业大学、同济大学、清华大学、中国科学院生 态环境研究中心、 北控水务集团、深圳环境水务集团、上海城投水务(集团)有限公司等就高品质制水、供水、水消毒、水安全监测、检测等进行案例分 享。 泰林作为水生态（微生物、寄生虫和浮游生物）检测整体解决方案提供商，携手合作伙伴江苏宏众百德生物科技有限公司，以"加速推进智慧化水质监 测"的理念，凭借"高效监测"的核心优势，应邀参加此次论坛。 展出产品包括藻类/两虫智能分析仪、藻类人工智能分析仪、全自动两虫检测系统、程控定量封口机、酶底物法微生物自动计数仪、微生物检验仪、酶底 物法微生物检测试剂、菌落总数检测组件、取样瓶和定量盘等系列设备和耗材，与行业专家、终端用户和参展企业一起交流分享准确、高效、智能的水质 检测与分析技术。 凌经理深入剖析了智能监测技术在饮用水安全保障中的核心价值，全面介绍了泰林创新构建的水生态检测产品体系及其在全场景下的应用实践。他指出， 泰林通过打造涵盖"在线监测、便携检测、应急响应"的立体化产品矩阵，成功构建了覆盖水源预警、过程 ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the new national standards for drinking water, specifically GB5750-2023, which includes key changes in detection methods, limit adjustments, and compliance operation points [3] - It discusses the challenges of intelligent control in wastewater treatment plants, focusing on data-driven process optimization and cost control strategies to improve operational efficiency [3] - The article highlights the hidden pollution risks in drinking water, such as microplastics and resistant genes, and the need for rapid detection technologies and emergency response plans to ensure safety from source to tap [3] Group 2 - It provides a guide for instrument selection, emphasizing the importance of matching monitoring instruments to specific scenarios, along with best practices for sample pretreatment and water quality diagnosis models [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the limitations of simple water quality testing pens, which are often misinterpreted by consumers as reliable tools for assessing drinking water safety. These devices lack comprehensive and accurate evaluation capabilities, potentially misleading the public about water quality safety [1][2]. Group 1: Limitations of Water Quality Testing Pens - Water quality testing pens can only measure a few indicators such as total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, and residual chlorine, failing to cover the 97 indicators outlined in national drinking water safety standards, which include harmful substances like E. coli, lead, and mercury [1][2]. - The testing methods of these pens differ significantly from national standards, which utilize more rigorous techniques such as weight methods for TDS and colorimetric methods for pH and residual chlorine, ensuring more reliable results [2]. Group 2: Regulatory and Public Awareness Recommendations - Government departments are urged to enhance regulation and public education regarding water quality testing, including stricter oversight of misleading advertising for testing pens and collaboration with professional organizations to disseminate knowledge [2]. - Online platforms should take responsibility for content verification and improve content delivery mechanisms using big data algorithms, while the public is encouraged to enhance scientific literacy and seek professional testing services for accurate water quality assessments [3].