近日，齐鲁晚报·齐鲁壹点记者从信用中国获悉，苏州仕净科技股份有限公司（仕净科技 301030.SZ）作为泰安高新区乡村振兴产业园建设项目中的机电安装 工程施工总承包单位，在其施工过程中，存在其专业分包工程发包人为苏州仕净环保科技有限公司的情形。泰安高新技术产业开发区管理委员会对苏州仕净 科技股份有限公司处工程合同价款（99000000元）百分之零点九的罚款，即罚款891000元；对苏州仕净科技股份有限公司项目经理处单位罚款数额百分之九 的罚款，即罚款80190元。 | 被执行人姓名/名称： | 苏州仕净科技股份有限公司 | | --- | --- | | 身份证号码/组织机构代码： | 9132050077****051M | | 执行法院: | 苏州市相城区人民法院 | | 立案时间： | 2025年08月27日 | | 菜号: | (2025)苏0507执4848号 | | 执行标的: | 5939002 | 仕净科技成立于2005年，注册资本1亿元，拥有147项专利，是一家具备高技术水准的环境污染治理综合研发制造企业，仕净科技拥有宁国环创（生产基 地）、苏迪罗（远程在线监测中心）、顺泽环境（VOCs泄漏 ...

Core Viewpoint - Environmental pollution control companies have been involved in pollution incidents, raising concerns about their role as polluters rather than protectors of the environment [1][2]. Group 1: Reasons for Violations - Weak legal awareness among small and micro enterprises leads to negligence of laws and regulations, resulting in unethical practices when handling projects [2]. - Limited technical capabilities of these companies often result in inadequate compliance with project requirements, prompting them to engage in illegal activities such as unauthorized wastewater discharge [2]. - The pursuit of maximum economic benefits drives some companies to cut corners, leading to substandard operations and environmental harm [2]. Group 2: External Pressures - Economic pressures and low bidding prices create a challenging environment for companies, pushing some to lower their environmental standards and engage in deceptive practices [3]. - The influence of clients (the "first party") can pressure environmental companies (the "second party") into falsifying data to maintain contracts, compromising environmental integrity [2][3]. Group 3: Regulatory Recommendations - Increased regulatory oversight by local ecological and environmental departments is necessary to address common violations such as illegal discharges and falsified environmental monitoring [3]. - There is a need for stricter penalties for intentional violations by environmental companies to deter future misconduct [3]. - Enhancing the connection between administrative enforcement and criminal justice is crucial for effectively addressing severe violations and ensuring accountability [3].