Core Viewpoint - The rising costs of badminton are attributed to a combination of raw material shortages and increased demand, necessitating a collaborative approach to optimize the industry chain, innovate technology, and guide policies for a sustainable badminton industry ecosystem [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Chain Optimization - Establishing a stable and sustainable supply chain is crucial to address the raw material crisis, which is primarily caused by supply-demand imbalances. A new supply system for badminton feathers can be created through a "company + farmer" order model, ensuring a stable source of feathers by signing long-term purchase agreements with breeders [1]. - The development of a specialized breeding system for "sports-grade feather ducks and geese" is recommended, involving agricultural research institutions and leading enterprises to cultivate high-quality feather varieties [1]. Group 2: Technological Innovation - The badminton manufacturing industry is currently labor-intensive, with processes like feather sorting relying heavily on manual labor, leading to inefficiencies and high error rates. Implementing smart manufacturing technologies, such as AI visual sorting and 3D modeling, can significantly enhance raw material utilization [2]. - There is a need to explore new alternative materials, with companies encouraged to invest in research on biocompatible materials to overcome technical challenges related to flight stability and promote the use of synthetic shuttlecocks [2]. Group 3: Policy Guidance - Policy support from relevant authorities is essential for promoting high-quality development in the industry. This includes assisting domestic companies in achieving breakthroughs in new material research and artificial shuttlecock technology [2]. - Incorporating badminton into sports welfare procurement programs can expand the coverage of sports consumption vouchers, thereby reducing consumer costs. Additionally, establishing a market regulation mechanism for feather raw materials can help stabilize price fluctuations and prevent disorderly market competition [2]. - A warning system for abnormal price fluctuations should be constructed to combat monopolistic behaviors in response to excessive price hikes [2].