都市制造业

Search documents
二看佛山:城市中心转型背后的改革逻辑
21世纪经济报道· 2025-09-06 09:01
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformation of Chancheng District in Foshan, which has shifted from a traditional development model to a high-quality growth strategy, becoming a leading example of urban transformation in China [1][3]. Group 1: Urban Development Strategy - Chancheng has identified its position within the broader national context of transitioning from extensive growth to high-quality development, focusing on technological innovation and demand expansion [3][4]. - The district aims to upgrade from a "central urban area" to a "city center," establishing four key centers: urban manufacturing, industrial services, commercial consumption, and Lingnan culture [3][4]. Group 2: Resource Optimization - Chancheng faces challenges in optimizing land resources for new enterprises, as many startups leave due to a lack of space [7][9]. - The "collective land to national land" reform aims to reduce transaction costs and improve land use efficiency, facilitating the integration of industrial development with urban renewal [7][9]. Group 3: Service Industry Development - The district recognizes the trend of "manufacturing returning to urban areas," emphasizing the need for high-end production services to support traditional industry upgrades [10][11]. - Chancheng has launched a three-year action plan for productive service industries, aiming to create a service center that empowers the manufacturing sector [10][11]. Group 4: Consumer Market Potential - Foshan's per capita disposable income is significantly higher than national and provincial averages, indicating strong consumer potential [12]. - The district is seizing the opportunity to develop a commercial consumption center, enhancing local shopping experiences and retaining consumer spending within the region [12][14]. Group 5: Reform and Innovation - Chancheng's reform experience highlights a shift from relying on large-scale government projects to fostering market-driven growth through innovative resource allocation [15][18]. - The district's approach emphasizes the role of government as a facilitator rather than a primary driver of economic growth, promoting a collaborative environment for various stakeholders [17][18].