SUCCESSORS. PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID TO BE CONSIDERING A NUMBER OF CANDIDATES TO REPLACE PAM BINDY. EPA HEAD LEE ZELDIN BEING REPORTED AS A POSSIBLE FRONT RUNNER FOR THE NOMINATION, A FORMER CONGRESSMAN FROM NEW YORK AND A CLOSE ALLY OF THE PRESIDENT.FOUR PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE MATTERTEL, MSNOW, SEVERAL OTHER NAMES HAVE BEEN FLOATED. YES, JEANINE PIRO, PITCHING HERSELF FOR THE position. She's currently serving as U .S.attorney for the District of Columbia after a long stretch at Fox News. Another name in the ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of Oddity Tech Ltd. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on May 11, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Oddity securities between February 26, 2025, and February 24, 2026, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the deadline [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms issuing notices may lack the necessary experience and resources [3]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Oddity's management made false or misleading statements regarding the company's digital operating model and market position, particularly due to an algorithm change by its largest advertising partner that increased customer acquisition costs [4]. - The misleading statements led to an overstatement of Oddity's business prospects, resulting in investor damages when the true situation was revealed [4].

The folks at @crosbylegal just raised $60 million to continue building the law firm of the future by embracing AI.Our team invested more than a year ago on the simple premise that “selling the work” instead of “selling software” would be a valuable approach.It doesn’t hurt that the company is run by a number of incredibly talented people as well.Here is an excerpt from the original investment memo.@m_franceschetti ...

Core Viewpoint - PomDoctor Ltd. is facing a securities fraud lawsuit, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for April 7, 2026, for investors who incurred losses exceeding $100,000 during the class period from October 9, 2025, to December 11, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that PomDoctor made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding a fraudulent stock promotion scheme, insider trading, and misleading public statements about its business and operations [5]. - Investors who purchased PomDoctor securities during the class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering significant amounts for investors [4]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested investors can join by submitting a form or contacting the firm directly [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) is facing a securities fraud lawsuit following an indictment related to illegal export activities involving U.S. artificial intelligence technology to China, which has resulted in significant financial losses for shareholders [2][3]. Group 1: Indictment and Allegations - On March 19, 2026, the U.S. Justice Department unsealed an indictment against three individuals associated with Super Micro for diverting servers containing U.S. AI technology to China, violating export control laws [2]. - The indictment claims that these activities generated approximately $2.5 billion in sales between 2024 and 2025 [2]. - The individuals involved include Yih-Shyan Liaw, a co-founder and Senior Vice President, Ruei-Tsang Chang, a general manager in Taiwan, and Ting-Wei Sun, a third-party broker [2]. Group 2: Company Response - Super Micro issued a statement distancing itself from the indictment, noting that it has not been named a defendant and that the involved individuals have been placed on administrative leave [3]. - The company confirmed its cooperation with the government's investigation [3]. Group 3: Stock Market Reaction - Following the indictment announcement, Super Micro's stock price dropped by $10.26, or 33.3%, closing at $20.53 per share on March 20, 2026, with unusually high trading volume [3]. Group 4: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit alleges that during the class period, the defendants made materially false statements and failed to disclose significant facts about the company's operations, including illegal sales to Chinese companies [4][5]. - Specific allegations include the failure to disclose that a significant portion of server sales were to China, which violated U.S. export control laws, and that there were weaknesses in compliance controls [5].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Gemini Space Station, Inc. for misrepresentations related to its Initial Public Offering and subsequent securities sales [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Gemini Class A common stock during its IPO on September 12, 2025, or acquired securities between September 12, 2025, and February 17, 2026 [1]. - Investors have until May 18, 2026, to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [2]. Group 2: Corporate Changes and Stock Performance - On February 5, 2026, Gemini announced a significant corporate pivot to "Gemini 2.0," which included a focus on its prediction market, a 25% workforce reduction, and exiting the UK, EU, and Australian markets [2]. - Following this announcement, Gemini's Class A common stock price fell by $0.64, or 8.72%, closing at $6.70 per share [2]. - On February 17, 2026, the company announced the departure of key executives and reported a 40% increase in operating expenses for 2025, leading to a further decline in stock price by $0.97, or 12.9%, closing at $6.585 per share [3]. - At the time of the lawsuit filing, Gemini's Class A common stock was trading at $5.96 per share, reflecting a 78.7% decline from its IPO price of $28.00 per share [4].

Core Insights - Green Stream Holdings, Inc. is undergoing a significant change in executive leadership and board composition, alongside a strategic shift towards integrating Law90, LLC and its subsidiaries [1][2] Leadership and Board Changes - James C. DiPrima has appointed new executive officers and directors, resigning from his positions effective March 17 and March 19, 2026, respectively [2] Appointment of Chief Executive Officer - Jim Schramm has been appointed as the new CEO, bringing extensive experience in media production and advertising [3][6] - The strategic initiative includes the planned conveyance of Law90, LLC to Green Stream Holdings, Inc., pending customary approvals [3] Law90 Integration - Law90 operates as a legal-industry referral platform that connects consumers with attorneys, and its integration is expected to be a core component of GSFI's business model [4] Business Direction - Green Stream Holdings, Inc. aims to evolve into an AI-studio-based advertising and media company, focusing on the intersection of media, technology, and legal-services marketing [5] Executive Leadership - The new executive team includes: - Jim Schramm as Chief Executive Officer - Phil Yang as Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director, with a background in residential lending and asset acquisition [6][10] Management Commentary - The CEO emphasized that the integration of Law90 is a crucial step in developing scalable production, distribution, and referral capabilities across various channels [11]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Paysafe Limited securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit has been filed against Paysafe Limited, and investors who purchased securities between March 4, 2025, and November 12, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees [1][2] - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by April 7, 2026 [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Paysafe made false or misleading statements regarding its ecommerce business, including significant exposure to a high-risk client and understated credit loss reserves [4] - It is claimed that these issues negatively impacted Paysafe's revenue growth and that the company was unlikely to meet its financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 [4]

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, today announced that it has commenced an investigation on behalf of FS KKR Capital Corp. ("FS KKR†or the "Company†) (NYSE: FSK) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of the federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON FS KKR CAPITAL CORP. (FSK), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Happened? On F. ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Paysafe Limited (NYSE: PSFE) for allegedly misleading investors about its business prospects during the period from March 4, 2025, to November 12, 2025 [2][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Issues - The lawsuit claims that Paysafe failed to disclose significant risks, including heavy reliance on a single high-risk client, which led to understated credit loss reserves and write-offs [2]. - It is alleged that Paysafe had undisclosed issues with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, complicating its banking relationships [2]. - These undisclosed issues are believed to have negatively impacted the company's revenue growth and overall revenue mix, making it unlikely for Paysafe to meet its financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 [2]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the revelation of these issues, Paysafe's stock price dropped by $2.80, or 27.6%, closing at $7.36 per share on November 13, 2025 [3]. Group 3: Shareholder Actions - Shareholders who wish to participate in the class action must submit their papers to the court by April 7, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [4]. - Shareholders are not required to participate in the case to be eligible for recovery and can remain absent class members if they choose [4].