Core Viewpoint - The article critiques the credibility of Gaode Map's "Street Ranking" and its AI capabilities, highlighting the absurdity of ranking a fictional restaurant from a Japanese manga as a top food destination in Chengdu, questioning the effectiveness of its data collection and analysis methods [6][10][12]. Summary by Sections Gaode Map's Ranking and AI Limitations - Gaode Map's "Street Ranking" places "Fujiwara Tofu Shop" third in Chengdu's food rankings, which is seen as a misrepresentation of local culinary culture [6][10]. - The article emphasizes that the ranking is based on AI that may not accurately reflect real user experiences or locations, as the actual distance to the shop is about 30 kilometers from the city center [12][13]. Historical Context and User Experience - The author shares a personal anecdote about being misrepresented as a "Cadillac owner" visiting massage parlors due to Gaode Map's previous reports, illustrating the potential for AI to misinterpret user data [17][19]. - The article reflects on how Gaode Map's AI has evolved over the years, suggesting that earlier versions were less reliable than current iterations [20][21]. Marketing Strategy and User Engagement - Gaode Map's claim of "never commercializing" its ranking system is seen as a strategic move to position itself against competitors, appealing to users disillusioned with traditional food ranking systems [31]. - The article discusses Gaode Map's "10 billion subsidy" initiative aimed at encouraging offline consumption, indicating a shift towards enhancing user engagement and loyalty [31][35]. Broader Implications for the Industry - The article suggests that Gaode Map's focus on marketing and user engagement may overshadow its core functionality as a navigation tool, raising questions about its long-term sustainability and profitability [35]. - It highlights the competitive landscape of navigation and mapping services, where user habits and perceptions play a crucial role in determining success [35].