Private Funds

Search documents
7月新备案私募规模破千亿
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-08-23 02:09
整体来看,7月,在中基协资产管理业务综合报送平台(以下简称AMBERS系统)办理通过的机构22家,其中,私募证券投资基金管理人6家,私募股 权、创业投资基金管理人16家。2025年7月,注销私募基金管理人78家。7月末,存续私募基金管理人19700家,管理基金数量139430只,管理基金规模 20.68万亿元。 【环球网财经综合报道】据中国证券投资基金业协会(简称"中基协")日前披露的数据,7月新备案私募基金数量达1689只,新备案规模达1074.27亿 元,较6月的500.57亿元增长114.6%。 从产品分类来看,7月新备案私募证券投资基金数量为1313只,规模达792.81亿元,较6月大幅增长163.8%。私募股权投资基金和创业投资基金新备案规 模分别为113.57亿元和167.89亿元。 从注册地分布来看(按36个辖区),7月末,已登记私募基金管理人数量集中在上海市、北京市、深圳市、浙江省(除宁波)、广东省(除深圳)和江 苏省,总计占比达72.20%,略高于6月份的72.19%。其中,上海市3695家、北京市3234家、深圳市2961家、浙江省(除宁波)1569家、广东省(除深 圳)1561家、江苏省 ...
深圳证监局通报辖区私募基金监管情况 要求加强投资运作管理
news flash· 2025-05-08 09:02
智通财经5月8日电,深圳证监局发布最新一期深圳私募基金监管情况通报。通报指出,近年来,深圳证 监局在日常监管中发现,辖区部分私募基金管理人存在违反法律法规规定、违反基金合同约定开展投资 运作的情形,产品估值、申购赎回及关联交易等展业行为损害投资者权益的情形较为突出,个别机构触 犯挪用基金财产的底线要求。发生上述情形的核心原因在于,私募基金管理人在私募基金投资运作过程 中未谨慎勤勉履行投资管理义务。深圳证监局要求,辖区各私募基金管理人应当谨慎勤勉履行投资管理 义务,确保投资运作不违反监管规则要求、基金合同约定,不得损害投资者合法权益。 深圳证监局通报辖区私募基金监管情况 要求加强投资运作管理 ...
私募基金风险评级那些事儿:一旦与自身不匹配,这样做就对了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-05 17:12
Core Viewpoint - Private equity funds are favored by investors for their high return potential, but the associated risks are often overlooked, highlighted by recent payment crises due to regulatory violations by several private equity firms [1] Group 1: Risk Rating of Private Equity Funds - The risk rating of private equity funds is classified into five levels (R1-R5) based on both quantitative and qualitative analyses, as per the "Guidelines for the Management of Investor Suitability in Fund Raising Institutions (Trial)" [3] - Quantitative indicators include beta coefficient, standard deviation, and Value at Risk (VaR), which measure volatility and liquidity risks [3] - Qualitative factors involve the concentration of investment targets, complexity of product structure, and special risks from related transactions, emphasizing the importance of compliance in risk rating [3] Group 2: Responding to Mismatched Risk Ratings - Investors must ensure their risk tolerance aligns with the fund's risk rating through a questionnaire that assesses their risk preference (C1-C5 levels) [6] - If the fund manager fails to conduct a substantive assessment, investors can claim a breach of suitability obligations and seek compensation [7] - Strategies for addressing mismatched products include exercising the "cooling-off period" to withdraw investments within 24 hours, negotiating adjustments to investment plans, and timely exit if there are violations such as fund misappropriation [7][8] Group 3: Legal Recourse and Investor Rights - Investors can file administrative complaints with the CSRC or the Asset Management Association of China to trigger regulatory investigations [8] - Civil lawsuits can be pursued against fund managers for breaching fiduciary duties, requiring proof of direct causation between disclosure violations and losses [8] - Effective legal actions include seeking civil compensation for breaches of suitability obligations or disclosure violations, and reporting to law enforcement for illegal fundraising or fraud [12] Group 4: Best Practices for Investors - Investors should ensure that contracts clearly stipulate disclosure obligations regarding underlying assets to avoid information blind spots [9] - Contracts should include detailed risk disclosure clauses to highlight special risks such as related transactions and reliance on single targets [9] - Maintaining a comprehensive evidence chain, including risk assessment questionnaires and recorded communications, is crucial for future legal claims [9]