Core Points - A senior executive from a chip company was found to have leaked core business secrets to a competitor, raising concerns about high-tech security [1][2] - The company, recognized as a high-tech enterprise, had implemented strict data protection measures, including physical isolation of servers and confidentiality agreements with employees [2][3] - The executive used a super administrator account to transfer sensitive data to a personal cloud storage, which included critical technology codes for an AI processor project [3][4] - The case highlights the challenges in calculating damages for stolen trade secrets, as the technology in question had not yet been commercially licensed [5][6] - The court utilized a cost-based method to assess the value of the stolen trade secrets, focusing on relevant research and development costs [5][7] - An expert advisor from the semiconductor industry was involved in the case to provide technical insights, reflecting the need for specialized knowledge in legal proceedings related to technology [6][7] - The court's ruling emphasized the importance of protecting intellectual property in the rapidly evolving tech sector, particularly in relation to AI and semiconductor industries [10][11] - The case serves as a precedent for future legal actions involving trade secret theft in high-tech industries, reinforcing the legal framework for protecting intangible assets [10][11]