来源|凤凰网财经《公司研究院》 而这片百万科技精英聚集的硅谷圣地，正在上演AI时代最炽烈的人才暗战。今年以来，苹果AI团队十余核心成员相继离职，加入Meta、OpenAI等科技巨 头；微软则将DeepMind超二十名精英纳入麾下；Meta一周挖走OpenAI 8名核心人才（含四位华人）。天价悬赏令下，"挖墙脚"的战火已经烧至年薪上亿。 如今，这场科技圈的"无间道"再添新战：苹果指控OPPO以高薪挖角Apple Watch核心工程师，怂恿其窃取健康传感器等商业机密。 据彭博社报道，当地时间8月21日，科技巨头苹果在美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞联邦法院递交了一份诉状，指控前Apple Watch华裔传感器架构师Chen Shi在离 职前系统性窃取核心商业机密。此后，这位月薪2.8万美元的核心技术骨干，转投OPPO硅谷研发中心带队搞竞品。 苹果怒斥这是"系统性窃密"。凤凰网财经《公司研究院》致电OPPO官方客服，对方的回应是："公司已关注该事件，以官方消息为准"。 这场跨国科技"谍战"，不仅关乎63份核心机密的归属，更是揭开了全球科技巨头在人才争夺战中不为人知的暗面。 作者|DW 当硅谷人才争夺战撞上跨国技术"谍战"，科 ...

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials Inc. for alleged trade secret infringement related to plasma source and wafer surface treatment technologies [1] Group 1: Legal Action - Yitang claims that Applied Materials illegally obtained and used its core technology secrets, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1] - The lawsuit has been filed in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, with a claim amount of 99.99 million RMB [1] - The case has been officially registered as of the announcement date [1] Group 2: Employee Recruitment - Applied Materials is accused of hiring two employees from Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., who possess knowledge of the core technology related to plasma generation and processing methods [1] - Evidence suggests that after their recruitment, these employees contributed to a patent application submitted to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration, with them listed as the main inventors [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., Ltd. against Applied Materials for allegedly misappropriating its core technology related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming damages of 99.99 million RMB [2][5][6]. Group 1: Legal Action - Yitang Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials for illegal acquisition and use of its core technology secrets, specifically related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5]. - The lawsuit claims that Applied Materials violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China by disclosing and claiming ownership of Yitang's technology through a patent application [6]. Group 2: Technology and Business Impact - Yitang's key technology involves high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is widely used in its semiconductor processing equipment [5]. - The company asserts that the two employees hired by Applied Materials had previously worked at Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the technology [5][6]. - Yitang Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, production, and sales of wafer processing equipment for integrated circuit manufacturing, and is one of the few domestic companies with multiple R&D capabilities in this field [6]. Group 3: Market Position - As of the article's publication, Yitang Co., Ltd. has a market capitalization of approximately 67.623 billion RMB, following its listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board on July 8 [6].

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. (Yitang) has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) for allegedly misappropriating its trade secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming damages of 99.99 million RMB [1][2] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Yitang has initiated legal action in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, asserting that AMAT unlawfully acquired and utilized its core technology secrets and disclosed them through a patent application in China [1][2] - The lawsuit has been officially filed, but the court has yet to schedule a hearing [1] - Yitang claims that the lawsuit will not significantly impact its operations or production [1] Group 2: Technology and Intellectual Property - The technology in question involves high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma used for wafer surface treatment, which is critical for Yitang's semiconductor processing equipment [1] - The two employees involved in the case were previously employed by Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc. (MTI), and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the technology [2] - Evidence suggests that AMAT submitted a patent application to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration, naming the two former MTI employees as primary inventors, thereby disclosing Yitang's trade secrets [2] Group 3: Impact on Business - Yitang alleges that AMAT's actions have caused significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests, including promoting and selling products that utilize the misappropriated technology in China [2]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Yitang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for alleged illegal acquisition and use of its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, claiming significant damage to its intellectual property and economic interests [4][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court and is currently in the pre-trial stage [2][4]. - The lawsuit amount is set at RMB 99.99 million (approximately 14.1 million USD) [5][6]. - The company requests the court to order the defendant to cease the use and disclosure of its technology secrets and to destroy any related materials [5][6]. Group 2: Company Position and Impact - The company emphasizes that this lawsuit is a legitimate action to protect its intellectual property rights and will not have a significant adverse impact on its operations [3][8]. - The company has a strong commitment to original research and development, and it is closely monitoring the lawsuit's progress [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., a domestic semiconductor equipment manufacturer, against Applied Materials (AMAT) for allegedly misappropriating its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Yitang Co. has filed a lawsuit in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court against AMAT for illegally obtaining and using its core technology secrets, which were disclosed in a patent application in China [2][6]. - The company is seeking a total compensation of 99.99 million yuan for economic losses and reasonable expenses related to the infringement [2][5]. - The lawsuit aims to protect the intellectual property rights of innovators and maintain the company's legal rights without significantly impacting its operations [5]. Group 2: Technology and Market Position - Yitang Co. specializes in high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma technology, which is crucial for its semiconductor processing equipment, including dry stripping, dry etching, and surface treatment [5][6]. - The company claims to possess leading original technology capabilities in this field and has relevant trade secrets [5]. - Applied Materials, founded in 1967, is the second-largest semiconductor equipment supplier globally, with projected revenues exceeding $25 billion in 2024, following ASML [6].

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Co., Ltd. (688729) has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for infringement of trade secrets, claiming damages of 99.99 million yuan [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Action Details - Yitang alleges that Applied Materials illegally obtained and used its core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1][4]. - The lawsuit has been filed in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, and the case has been officially registered but has not yet gone to trial [1][6]. Group 2: Technology and Employment Issues - Yitang's key technology involves the use of high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is widely applied in its semiconductor processing equipment [4]. - Two employees, previously working at Yitang's subsidiary Mattson Technology, Inc., were recruited by Applied Materials and are alleged to have disclosed Yitang's trade secrets in a patent application submitted to the Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration [4][6]. Group 3: Financial Impact and Company Position - Yitang is seeking a court order to stop Applied Materials from using its trade secrets and to compensate for economic losses, including punitive damages amounting to 99.99 million yuan [6]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to original research and development and the importance of intellectual property protection, stating that the lawsuit will not significantly impact its operations [6]. - Yitang reported revenues of 4.763 billion yuan, 3.931 billion yuan, and 4.633 billion yuan for the years 2022 to 2024, with a compound annual growth rate of 18.9% in net profit [6].

Core Viewpoint - Yitang Semiconductor Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials for illegally obtaining and using its trade secrets, claiming damages of 99.99 million yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Action - The lawsuit was filed in Beijing Intellectual Property Court, with a claim amount of 99.99 million yuan [1]. - Yitang Semiconductor alleges that Applied Materials has violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China by disclosing and claiming ownership of its trade secrets through a patent application [4]. - The company has made six requests in the lawsuit, including a demand for Applied Materials to cease using the trade secrets and to compensate for economic losses with punitive damages [4]. Group 2: Technology and Expertise - Yitang Semiconductor's key technology involves the use of high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma for wafer surface treatment, which is critical for its semiconductor processing equipment [1]. - The two employees involved in the case had previously worked for Yitang's wholly-owned subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc., and had signed confidentiality agreements regarding the trade secrets [1][4]. - Evidence suggests that after being hired by Applied Materials, these employees submitted a patent application that disclosed Yitang's trade secrets [1]. Group 3: Company Position and Impact - Yitang Semiconductor emphasizes its commitment to original research and development and the importance of protecting intellectual property [4]. - The company asserts that the lawsuit is a legitimate measure to protect its rights and maintain fair market competition, stating it will not significantly impact its operations [4][5]. - The actual impact of the lawsuit on the company's profits cannot be determined until the court reaches a final judgment [5].

格隆汇8月13日丨屹唐股份(688729.SH)公布，公司认为应用材料公司（APPLIEDMATERIALS,INC.） （简称"应用材料公司"、"被告"）非法获取并使用了公司的等离子体源及晶圆表面处理相关的核心技术 秘密，并在中国境内以申请专利的方式披露了该技术秘密，且将该专利申请权据为己有，违反了《中华 人民共和国反不正当竞争法》的规定，构成侵犯商业秘密的违法行为，对公司的知识产权和经济利益造 成严重的损害。公司就该事项向北京知识产权法院提起诉讼，于近日收到法院出具的《民事案件受理及 举证通知书》等相关材料，案号为（2025）京73民初908号。截至本公告披露日，该案件已立案，尚未 开庭审理。诉讼金额为人民币9,999万元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The increasing number of intellectual property and trade secret infringement disputes between large tech companies and their former employees has raised concerns in the venture capital community, impacting investment strategies and risk assessments [2][3][11]. Group 1: Recent Legal Cases - On July 28, a Shanghai court sentenced 14 former employees of Zunpai Communications Technology for infringing Huawei's trade secrets, resulting in a total fine of 13.5 million [2]. - JD.com reported that it has substantial evidence of intellectual property infringement against Jiushi Intelligent Technology, whose founding team previously worked in JD's autonomous vehicle division [2][6]. - CATL filed a lawsuit against Xiamen Haichen Energy Technology for unfair competition, highlighting the trend of former employees using proprietary technology from their previous employers [2][5]. Group 2: Impact on Venture Capital - Venture capital firms have become increasingly cautious, recognizing that lawsuits for intellectual property infringement can significantly affect the future prospects of startups and increase investment risks [3][11]. - Jiushi Intelligent recently completed a $300 million Series B funding round, and any legal issues could delay product launches, directly impacting business development and investor returns [3][11]. - Venture capitalists are enhancing their due diligence processes to assess potential conflicts between the technology developed by former employees and their previous employers' patents [3][11]. Group 3: Causes of Disputes - Many disputes arise because former employees inadvertently use research results obtained during their tenure at large tech companies, believing they have the right to do so [4][8]. - The lack of clear agreements regarding the ownership of research results often leads to misunderstandings and legal conflicts [4][8]. - The trend of former employees leveraging proprietary technology to gain competitive advantages in new ventures has intensified the scrutiny from their former employers [8][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Resolution - Effective communication and preemptive agreements regarding the use of intellectual property are essential to mitigate disputes [4][10]. - Companies should implement comprehensive non-compete agreements and ensure they are enforced to prevent potential infringements [9][10]. - Venture capital firms are advised to include specific clauses in investment agreements to protect their interests in case of intellectual property violations by startup founders [13][14].