以下文章来源于文娱先声 ，作者先声编辑部 十万个好奇心，专注文娱观察与商业解读。 来源丨文娱先声（ wenyuxiansheng_） "我又被威尼斯电影节和朴赞郁欺骗了，没有笑点，没有快乐，只有失望。" 根据韩国电影振兴委员会数据，截至 9 月 30 日，由朴赞郁执导，李秉宪、孙艺珍主演的《无可奈 何》共计在韩本土累计观影人数超过 115 万，连续 6 天占据票房冠军。 然而，仅6天赏味新鲜期过，迎来的则是吐槽大于夸赞的口碑持续走低以及单日观影人次的走低。根 据韩国最大门户网站Naver的评分显示，评分在开画后持续下降、维持在6分左右浮动，远远低于朴 赞郁2022年上映的8.98分作品《分手的决心》。 文娱先声 . 作者丨丁茜雯 编辑丨先声编辑部 图源丨Midjourney 事实上，一度被看作是得奖领跑者、金狮奖热门、影后热门的《无可奈何》，甚至被视为有望借助海 外声誉反哺国内票房的救命稻草。但最终却零封收官，继续维持着今年韩国电影在国际电影节的陪跑 纪录。 整体上看，今年全球电影业均面临一定的低迷期，而韩国电影业则率先一步暴露出更为严峻的形势。 韩国电影也不行了？ 作为人口不过5000万、却是全球十大票仓之 ...

截至今年7月，韩国电影院上座率仅为5000万张票，这也是2004年以来（不包括疫情年）最低的一次。 尤其是本该为票房旺季的春节档前后，包括宋慧乔主演《黑修女们》、权相佑主演《漫画威龙2》、奉 俊昊导演好莱坞大片《编号17》等具有强号召力的演员、IP作品，都未能掀起观影热潮，甚至不乏达到 将将回本后，火速上线流媒体平台。同样的，被寄予厚望的暑期档，也因李敏镐与安孝燮主演，且是大 热IP改编的《全知读者视角》口碑扑街，难以挽回观影人群，票房等市场核心指标继续下滑。 与此同时，韩国电影的产量、投资规模、财团制作预算等方面也在持续降低。 "我又被威尼斯电影节和朴赞郁欺骗了，没有笑点，没有快乐，只有失望。" 根据韩国电影振兴委员会数据，截至9月30日，由朴赞郁执导，李秉宪、孙艺珍主演的《无可奈何》共 计在韩本土累计观影人数超过115万，连续6天占据票房冠军。 然而，仅6天赏味新鲜期过后，迎来的则是吐槽大于夸赞的口碑持续走低以及单日观影人次的走低。根 据韩国最大门户网站Naver的评分显示，评分在开画后持续下降、维持在6分左右浮动，远远低于朴赞郁 2022年上映的8.98分作品《分手的决心》。 事实上，一度被看作是得奖领 ...

Group 1: Venice Film Festival and Political Themes - The film "The Voice of Hind Rajab," directed by Tunisian filmmaker Kaouther Ben Hania, premiered at the Venice Film Festival, receiving a 23-minute standing ovation and winning the Silver Lion award [3] - The film depicts the true story of a 5-year-old Palestinian girl, Hind Rajab, who becomes the sole survivor of an airstrike in Gaza, highlighting the humanitarian crisis in the region [3][5] - The Venice Film Festival has increasingly focused on political and social issues, with films addressing topics such as nuclear weapons and climate disasters, creating a platform for discussing real-world problems [5][6] Group 2: Cultural Boycotts and Industry Reactions - A cultural boycott debate emerged at the festival, with approximately 3,900 film professionals signing a pledge to not collaborate with Israeli film institutions, citing concerns over human rights violations [6][7] - Israeli filmmakers expressed strong opposition to the boycott, arguing it harms those promoting dialogue and understanding, and emphasizing the importance of separating creators from government actions [7] - The festival has become a stage for political discourse, with media describing films as "quasi-urgent response units" that help audiences interpret a chaotic reality [7] Group 3: Alberta Book Ban Controversy - The Alberta government in Canada faced backlash for removing numerous literary works, including "The Handmaid's Tale," from school libraries under the guise of eliminating "explicit content," igniting debates over free speech and educational control [10][11] - Author Margaret Atwood criticized the ban and created a satirical short story in response, highlighting the absurdity of the government's stance on protecting children from literature [8][10] - Following public pressure, the Alberta government announced a pause on the book ban, allowing classic literature to remain in school libraries while clarifying the policy's intent [10][11] Group 4: Controversy Surrounding "Wuthering Heights" Adaptation - The trailer for the film adaptation of "Wuthering Heights," directed by Emerald Fennell, sparked controversy due to its significant deviation from Emily Brontë's original work, described as overly sexualized and lacking depth [12][14] - Critics argue that the adaptation reduces the complex themes of class and family dynamics in the original novel to a simplistic love story, undermining its literary significance [14] - The casting choices, particularly the portrayal of Heathcliff, have also drawn criticism for not aligning with the character's original description, raising concerns about fidelity to the source material [12][14] Group 5: Baillie Gifford Prize Longlist Announcement - The 2025 Baillie Gifford Prize longlist was announced, emphasizing personal narratives and historical insights, with a focus on individual experiences [15][17] - Notable works include Yiyun Li's memoir about her sons' suicides, praised for its unique perspective and emotional depth [15][17] - The prize continues to attract attention due to its sponsorship ties to fossil fuel investments, raising questions about the intersection of literature and ethical considerations [17]