Core Viewpoint - The value of scientific research should be assessed based on academic contributions rather than the publication platform, as emphasized by various experts in the field [3][4][5]. Group 1: Scientific Research Evaluation - Nobel Prize winners often have their significant work published in less prestigious journals, highlighting that groundbreaking research does not always appear in top-tier publications [3][4]. - The prevailing "top journal worship" is rooted in the evaluation system, where titles and awards are primarily based on publication in high-impact journals [4]. - Experts are calling for a reform in academic evaluation to focus on originality, methodological breakthroughs, and strategic relevance, moving away from the "impact factor trap" [4][5]. Group 2: Development of Academic Journals - China's academic journals should evolve from being mere "paper containers" to sources of knowledge innovation, as the current capacity of high-level international journals does not meet the demand for Chinese authors [5][6]. - The fragmented publishing model in China makes it difficult to compete with major international publishers, necessitating the creation of a national-level publishing platform [6]. - The National Natural Science Foundation of China has mandated that at least 20% of papers resulting from funded projects should be published in domestic scientific journals by 2025 [7]. Group 3: Unique Contributions and Challenges - Domestic academic journals are encouraged to focus on unique Chinese scientific issues, such as specific disease spectrums and complex geological structures, to enhance their impact [8]. - There is a need to support "non-consensus innovations" that may initially seem unconventional but are logically sound and imaginative, requiring strong editorial judgment [8].

Core Viewpoint - The international seminar on "Construction and Development of Scientific Journals" emphasizes the importance of enhancing the quality and internationalization of Chinese scientific journals to support technological innovation and development [1][2]. Group 1: Key Themes of the Seminar - The seminar focused on three main topics: quality control and high-quality development of scientific journals, knowledge services and enhancement of impact, and publication ethics and research evaluation [1]. - The need for an open and collaborative journal ecosystem was highlighted, along with the importance of reforming evaluation systems and innovating journal management mechanisms [1][2]. Group 2: Perspectives from Experts - The President of the China Publishing Association, Wu Shulin, stated that the next phase of development for Chinese scientific publishing is well-positioned, emphasizing the need for reform and a focus on open science, digitalization, marketization, and internationalization [2]. - Chen Fahua, Executive Editor of Science Bulletin, expressed a commitment to securing major original manuscripts and expanding international sources to establish a Chinese brand among top-tier international journals [2]. - Zhu Yongguan, Editor of Soil Ecology Letters, noted the exponential growth in journal numbers and publication volumes over the past 20 years, advocating for AI-based knowledge integration tools to extract key insights from the vast literature [2]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts and Future Outlook - The seminar included contributions from various international representatives, discussing the three main topics and sharing insights on the future of scientific publishing [3]. - Liu Xiaomin from the Chinese Academy of Sciences emphasized the need for enhanced international cooperation and the establishment of a publication integrity framework to promote research integrity [2]. - Former Editor-in-Chief of Science Bulletin, Zhu Zuoyan, expressed confidence that with national policy support, Chinese scientific journals will achieve faster and better development [4].