Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of cultural heritage protection in Henan province, highlighting the role of public interest litigation in safeguarding ancient artifacts and historical sites, as well as promoting cultural prosperity through legal frameworks [8][11][18]. Group 1: Public Interest Litigation in Cultural Heritage Protection - The newly revised Cultural Relics Protection Law includes provisions for public interest litigation, providing legal grounds for prosecutorial agencies to enhance their responsibilities in cultural heritage protection [8][11]. - The case involving the Tang Dynasty "Sea Beast Grape Mirror" illustrates the application of public interest litigation to hold accountable those who damage cultural relics during illegal transactions [9][11]. - The first civil public interest litigation case in Henan regarding movable cultural relics has set a precedent, emphasizing that cultural relics belong to the public and should be protected [11][12]. Group 2: Protection of Ancient Water Conservancy Facilities - The Five Dragon Mouth ancient water conservancy facility, dating back over 2,200 years, is recognized for its historical significance and ongoing irrigation function, making it a model for integrating cultural heritage protection with public welfare [12][13]. - Efforts are underway to apply for World Irrigation Heritage status for the facility, which would enhance its protection and utilization, thereby boosting Henan's cultural soft power [13][14]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts in Cultural Heritage Protection - The establishment of a collaborative mechanism between prosecutorial agencies and cultural departments aims to enhance the protection of cultural heritage sites, such as the Zhou Bridge and nearby Bianhe ruins [15][16]. - The "Walking Henan, Understanding China" public welfare action has been initiated to strengthen cooperation between prosecutorial and cultural tourism departments, focusing on cultural market regulation and heritage protection [17][18]. - As of June this year, 499 related cases have been handled, with 366 prosecutorial suggestions issued, showcasing the active role of prosecutorial agencies in cultural heritage protection [17].