Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that many children's AI programming courses are considered a "tax on intelligence" and may not be beneficial for children, as stated by Go champion Ke Jie [1][2] - Ke Jie emphasizes that if he had children, he would not allow them to engage with AI at a young age, suggesting that foundational skills like language should be prioritized instead [1][2] - The debate among parents is divided, with some agreeing with Ke Jie while others believe that such courses provide a constructive outlet for children, especially to avoid excessive gaming [1][2] Group 2 - The article highlights that children's programming training should not be a universal trend but rather a choice based on individual family and child circumstances, warning against blind participation [2] - There are numerous issues within the children's programming training sector, including unlicensed institutions, exaggerated claims about course benefits, and difficulties in obtaining refunds [2] - Ke Jie's comments reflect a broader concern regarding the chaotic state of children's programming training and serve as a reminder for parents to approach these decisions with caution [2] Group 3 - Many parents believe that early exposure to AI is necessary to keep up with the times, but the article argues that the rapid evolution of knowledge and technology may render such learning obsolete [3] - The focus should shift from merely learning AI skills to developing children's overall capabilities and thinking skills, emphasizing the importance of parental involvement in fostering good habits and cognitive development [3] - The article calls for a change in parenting perspectives, urging parents to avoid the misconception that more learning is always better, as this can burden children and hinder their personal growth [3]