Core Points - Zhou Dasheng has received a final ruling in a lawsuit involving a contract dispute amounting to 210 million yuan, with the court maintaining the first-instance judgment [1][3] - The court ordered Zhou Dasheng to compensate Shenzhen Waterbeika Information Technology Co., Ltd. 2.78 million yuan, rejecting other claims from Waterbeika [3][4] - Zhou Dasheng had already made provisions for the 2.78 million yuan as bad debt, indicating that the ruling will not impact the company's current or future profits [3][4] Legal Context - The dispute arose from a proposed collaboration between Zhou Dasheng, Waterbeika, and China Unicom's Shenzhen branch to promote the "Zhou Dasheng·Beika" package, which was terminated in mid-2022 due to objective reasons [4] - Waterbeika initiated the lawsuit following the termination of the project, leading to the current legal proceedings [4] Financial Implications - As of December 2023, Zhou Dasheng's bank accounts were partially frozen due to Waterbeika's application for property preservation related to the lawsuit [3] - The total amount involved in the lawsuit was reported to be 211 million yuan, with 80.45 million yuan of funds actually frozen [3]

Core Viewpoint - After nearly two years of litigation involving a contract dispute amounting to 210 million yuan, the company Zhou Dasheng announced the final ruling of the second instance, which upheld the first-instance judgment [1][3]. Group 1: Litigation Details - The company received a civil judgment stating that it must compensate Shenzhen Waterbeika Information Technology Co., Ltd. 2.78 million yuan, while other claims were dismissed [3]. - The total amount involved in the litigation was reported to be 211 million yuan, with 80.4483 million yuan of funds frozen due to the dispute [3][4]. - The business in question was related to a proposed collaboration between Zhou Dasheng, Waterbeika, and China Unicom's Shenzhen branch for promoting the "Zhou Dasheng·Beika" package, which was terminated in mid-2022 due to objective reasons [4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Zhou Dasheng indicated that it had already made a full provision for the bad debt of 2.78 million yuan based on a cautious principle, and the judgment would not affect the company's current or future profits [3].