培美曲塞

Search documents
厚鸿科技被出具警示函暴露汇宇制药公司治理问题?
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-06-04 10:58
1. 金融资产公允价值变动"粉饰"利润 6月4日,四川证监局发布公告,对北京厚鸿科技有限责任公司(以下简称"厚鸿科技")采取出具警示函 的行政监管措施,并记入证券期货市场诚信档案。 2024年1月,汇宇制药公告拟向子公司汇宇悦迎提供不超过6000万元的财务资助,厚鸿科技作为汇宇悦 迎持股39.9%的股东,承诺按比例提供资助。厚鸿科技是汇宇制药实际控制人丁兆直接控制的企业。根 据公告,厚鸿科技与成都厚汉均为丁兆控制的关联方 截至2024年8月15日,汇宇制药已提供2200万元资助,但厚鸿科技未履行承诺,构成《上市公司监管指 引第4号》第15条违规。 此外,实控人亲属涉短线交易遭监管批评。丁兆父母于2021-2023年频繁买卖公司股票,成交额281万 元,构成"买入后6个月内卖出"违规行为,丁兆因此被上交所通报批评。 业绩增长的表象与驱动力:非经常性损益主导下的"伪高增"? 汇宇制药2024年财报数据显示,其营业收入10.9亿元(同比+18.05%)、净利润3.25亿元(同比 +132.78%),表面呈现爆发式增长。然而,扣除非经常性损益后的净利润仅0.92亿元(同比 +39.55%),暴露业绩增长的脆弱性。核心 ...
ST赛隆2024年财报:营收利润双降,净利润暴跌447.67%
Jin Rong Jie· 2025-05-07 01:10
Core Insights - ST Sairong reported a significant decline in both revenue and net profit for 2024, indicating increased operational pressure due to market competition and policy adjustments in the pharmaceutical industry [1][3][5] Revenue and Profit Performance - The company's total revenue for 2024 was 264 million, a year-on-year decrease of 15.15% from 311 million in 2023 [1][3] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was -33 million, a drastic decline of 447.67% compared to the previous year [1][3] - The net profit after excluding non-recurring gains and losses was -33.5 million, reflecting a staggering drop of 1275.25% [1][3] R&D Investment and Outcomes - Despite increasing R&D investments, the conversion of these efforts into financial improvement has been limited [4] - The company received approval notifications for 12 raw materials, including hydrochloride esmolol and fluorouracil, and completed registrations for several injectable formulations [4] - The low efficiency in converting R&D outcomes into market competitiveness has exacerbated the company's financial burden [4] Market Competition and Sales Strategy - The pharmaceutical industry faced intensified competition in 2024, driven by policy changes and expanded centralized procurement [5] - ST Sairong adjusted its sales strategies to enhance market share and optimize product sales structure, but these efforts yielded limited results due to fierce competition [5] - Although sales and management expenses decreased, this reduction did not significantly improve net profit performance [5]